Ryzen 7 4800H vs A12-9720P

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

A12-9720P
2016
4 cores / 4 threads
1.72
Ryzen 7 4800H
2020
8 cores / 16 threads
12.01
+598%

Ryzen 7 4800H outperforms A12-9720P by 598% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary Details

Comparing A12-9720P and Ryzen 7 4800H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1927581
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Bristol RidgeAMD Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU)
Architecture codenameBristol Ridge (2016−2019)Renoir-H (Zen 2)
Release date1 June 2016 (7 years ago)6 January 2020 (4 years ago)
Current price$502 $1141

Detailed Specifications

A12-9720P and Ryzen 7 4800H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads416
Base clock speed2.7 GHz2.9 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz4.2 GHz
L1 cacheno data128K (per core)
L2 cache2 MB512K (per core)
L3 cacheno data12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm7 nm
Die size250 mm2156 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C105 °C
Number of transistors3100 Million9800 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on A12-9720P and Ryzen 7 4800H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFP4FP6
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt54 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A12-9720P and Ryzen 7 4800H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsDDR4-1866 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, TBM, FMA4, XOP, SMEP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRANDDDR4-3200/LPDDR4-4266 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A12-9720P and Ryzen 7 4800H are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A12-9720P and Ryzen 7 4800H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4, DDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB
Maximum memory bandwidthno data68.27 GB/s
ECC memory supportno data-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge)AMD Radeon RX Vega 7

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A12-9720P and Ryzen 7 4800H.

PCIe versionno data3.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A12-9720P 1.72
Ryzen 7 4800H 12.01
+598%

Ryzen 7 4800H outperforms A12-9720P by 598% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

A12-9720P 2653
Ryzen 7 4800H 18577
+600%

Ryzen 7 4800H outperforms A12-9720P by 600% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

A12-9720P 521
Ryzen 7 4800H 1462
+181%

Ryzen 7 4800H outperforms A12-9720P by 181% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

A12-9720P 1172
Ryzen 7 4800H 5946
+407%

Ryzen 7 4800H outperforms A12-9720P by 407% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

A12-9720P 2743
Ryzen 7 4800H 5684
+107%

Ryzen 7 4800H outperforms A12-9720P by 107% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

A12-9720P 7361
Ryzen 7 4800H 37276
+406%

Ryzen 7 4800H outperforms A12-9720P by 406% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

A12-9720P 13.01
Ryzen 7 4800H 3.38
+285%

A12-9720P outperforms Ryzen 7 4800H by 285% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

A12-9720P 3
Ryzen 7 4800H 21
+696%

Ryzen 7 4800H outperforms A12-9720P by 696% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

A12-9720P 235
Ryzen 7 4800H 1854
+691%

Ryzen 7 4800H outperforms A12-9720P by 691% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

A12-9720P 73
Ryzen 7 4800H 188
+159%

Ryzen 7 4800H outperforms A12-9720P by 159% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

A12-9720P 0.94
Ryzen 7 4800H 2.18
+132%

Ryzen 7 4800H outperforms A12-9720P by 132% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

A12-9720P 1.8
Ryzen 7 4800H 10.3
+472%

Ryzen 7 4800H outperforms A12-9720P by 472% in TrueCrypt AES.

Gaming performance

Pros & Cons Summary


Performance score 1.72 12.01
Integrated graphics card 1.95 7.43
Recency 1 June 2016 6 January 2020
Physical cores 4 8
Threads 4 16
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 54 Watt

The Ryzen 7 4800H is our recommended choice as it beats the A12-9720P in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A12-9720P and Ryzen 7 4800H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A12-9720P
A12-9720P
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
Ryzen 7 4800H

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 425 votes

Rate A12-9720P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 3007 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 4800H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about A12-9720P or Ryzen 7 4800H, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.