Processor 300 vs A12-9720P

VS

Aggregate performance score

A12-9720P
2016
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
1.67
Processor 300
2024
2 cores / 4 threads, 46 Watt
4.51
+170%

Processor 300 outperforms A12-9720P by a whopping 170% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A12-9720P and Processor 300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking20701319
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Bristol Ridgeno data
Power efficiency10.549.28
Architecture codenameBristol Ridge (2016−2019)Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Release date1 June 2016 (8 years ago)8 January 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$82

Detailed specifications

A12-9720P and Processor 300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2.7 GHz3.9 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz3.9 GHz
L1 cacheno data80 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size250 mm2163 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C100 °C
Number of transistors3100 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on A12-9720P and Processor 300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFP4FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt46 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A12-9720P and Processor 300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, TBM, FMA4, XOP, SMEP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRANDIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

A12-9720P and Processor 300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A12-9720P and Processor 300 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A12-9720P and Processor 300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data192 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data76.8 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) ( - 758 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 710
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data1.45 GHz
Execution Unitsno data16

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A12-9720P and Processor 300 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data4

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by A12-9720P and Processor 300 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096 x 2160 @ 60Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data5120 x 3200 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A12-9720P and Processor 300 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A12-9720P and Processor 300.

PCIe versionno data5.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A12-9720P 1.67
Processor 300 4.51
+170%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A12-9720P 2656
Processor 300 7160
+170%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.67 4.51
Integrated graphics card 1.96 2.85
Recency 1 June 2016 8 January 2024
Physical cores 4 2
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 46 Watt

A12-9720P has 100% more physical cores, and 206.7% lower power consumption.

Processor 300, on the other hand, has a 170.1% higher aggregate performance score, 45.4% faster integrated GPU, and an age advantage of 7 years.

The Processor 300 is our recommended choice as it beats the A12-9720P in performance tests.

Be aware that A12-9720P is a notebook processor while Processor 300 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A12-9720P and Processor 300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A12-9720P
A12-9720P
Intel Processor 300
Processor 300

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 437 votes

Rate A12-9720P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 24 votes

Rate Processor 300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A12-9720P or Processor 300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.