Atom x5-E3930 vs A12-9720P
Aggregate performance score
A12-9720P outperforms Atom x5-E3930 by a whopping 188% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing A12-9720P and Atom x5-E3930 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2071 | 2820 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | AMD Bristol Ridge | 5x Intel Atom |
| Power efficiency | 10.54 | 7.84 |
| Architecture codename | Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) | Apollo Lake (2014−2016) |
| Release date | 1 June 2016 (8 years ago) | 30 August 2014 (10 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
A12-9720P and Atom x5-E3930 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 4 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 2.7 GHz | 1.3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 1.8 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 56K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB (shared) |
| L3 cache | no data | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 250 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 90 °C | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 103 °C |
| Number of transistors | 3100 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on A12-9720P and Atom x5-E3930 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | FP4 | Intel BGA 1296 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 7 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A12-9720P and Atom x5-E3930. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, TBM, FMA4, XOP, SMEP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND | no data |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Security technologies
A12-9720P and Atom x5-E3930 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A12-9720P and Atom x5-E3930 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A12-9720P and Atom x5-E3930. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR3-1866 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 8 GB |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) ( - 758 MHz) | Intel HD Graphics 500 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A12-9720P and Atom x5-E3930.
| PCIe version | no data | 2.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 4 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.67 | 0.58 |
| Integrated graphics card | 1.96 | 0.77 |
| Recency | 1 June 2016 | 30 August 2014 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 2 |
| Threads | 4 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 7 Watt |
A12-9720P has a 187.9% higher aggregate performance score, 154.5% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 1 year, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.
Atom x5-E3930, on the other hand, has a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 114.3% lower power consumption.
The A12-9720P is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom x5-E3930 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between A12-9720P and Atom x5-E3930, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
