FX-4350 vs A12-9700P

Primary details

Comparing A12-9700P and FX-4350 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking	2019	1785
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	0.73
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop processor
Series	AMD Bristol Ridge	no data
Architecture codename	Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)	Vishera (2012−2015)
Release date	1 June 2016 (8 years ago)	29 April 2013 (11 years ago)
Current price	$536	$92

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Detailed specifications

A12-9700P and FX-4350 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	4 (Quad-Core)	4 (Quad-Core)
Threads	4	4
Base clock speed	2.5 GHz	4.2 GHz
Boost clock speed	3.4 GHz	4.3 GHz
L2 cache	2048 KB	4096 KB
Chip lithography	28 nm	32 nm
Die size	250 mm2	315 mm2
Maximum core temperature	90 °C	61 °C
Number of transistors	3100 Million	1,200 million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-
Unlocked multiplier	No	Yes
P0 Vcore voltage	no data	Min: 1.275 V - Max: 1.4 V

Compatibility

Information on A12-9700P and FX-4350 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	no data	1
Socket	FP4	AM3+
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A12-9700P and FX-4350. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	Dual-Channel DDR3/DDR4-1866 Memory Controller, PCIe 3.0 x8	no data
AES-NI	1	+
FMA	FMA4	+
AVX	no data	+
FRTC	1	no data
FreeSync	1	no data
PowerTune	-	no data
DualGraphics	1	no data
TrueAudio	-	no data
PowerNow	-	no data
PowerGating	-	no data
Out-of-band client management	-	no data
VirusProtect	-	no data
RAID	-	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A12-9700P and FX-4350 are enumerated here.

AMD-V	1	+
IOMMU 2.0	-	no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A12-9700P and FX-4350. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR3, DDR4-1866	DDR3
Max memory channels	2	no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card	AMD Radeon R7 Graphics	On certain motherboards (Chipset feature)
iGPU core count	6	no data
Enduro	+	no data
Switchable graphics	1	no data
UVD	+	no data
VCE	+	no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A12-9700P and FX-4350 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort	+	no data
HDMI	+	no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A12-9700P and FX-4350 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX	DirectX® 12	no data
Vulkan	1	no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A12-9700P and FX-4350.

PCIe version	3.0	n/a
PCI Express lanes	8	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-4350 outperforms A12-9700P by 35% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Performance score	1.58	2.14
Recency	1 June 2016	29 April 2013
Chip lithography	28 nm	32 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	125 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between A12-9700P and FX-4350, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---