EPYC 4244P vs A12-9700P

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A12-9700P
2016
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
1.53
EPYC 4244P
2024
6 cores / 12 threads, 65 Watt
17.31
+1031%

EPYC 4244P outperforms A12-9700P by a whopping 1031% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A12-9700P and EPYC 4244P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2138368
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data56.10
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD Bristol Ridgeno data
Power efficiency9.6525.20
Architecture codenameBristol Ridge (2016−2019)Raphael (2023−2024)
Release date1 June 2016 (8 years ago)21 May 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$229

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

A12-9700P and EPYC 4244P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads412
Base clock speed2.5 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz5.1 GHz
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cache2048 KB1 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data32 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm5 nm
Die size250 mm271 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data61 °C
Number of transistors3100 Million6,570 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on A12-9700P and EPYC 4244P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFP4AM5
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A12-9700P and EPYC 4244P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMAFMA4-
AVX-+
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
DualGraphics+-
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A12-9700P and EPYC 4244P are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A12-9700P and EPYC 4244P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4DDR5
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R7 GraphicsAMD Radeon Graphics
iGPU core count6no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A12-9700P and EPYC 4244P integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A12-9700P and EPYC 4244P integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A12-9700P and EPYC 4244P.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes828

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A12-9700P 1.53
EPYC 4244P 17.31
+1031%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A12-9700P 2432
EPYC 4244P 27492
+1030%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.53 17.31
Recency 1 June 2016 21 May 2024
Physical cores 4 6
Threads 4 12
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 65 Watt

A12-9700P has 333.3% lower power consumption.

EPYC 4244P, on the other hand, has a 1031.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, 50% more physical cores and 200% more threads, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 4244P is our recommended choice as it beats the A12-9700P in performance tests.

Be aware that A12-9700P is a notebook processor while EPYC 4244P is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A12-9700P and EPYC 4244P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A12-9700P
A12-9700P
AMD EPYC 4244P
EPYC 4244P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 121 vote

Rate A12-9700P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 5 votes

Rate EPYC 4244P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A12-9700P or EPYC 4244P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.