E1-6010 vs A12-9700P

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary Details

Comparing A12-9700P and E1-6010 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1983not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Bristol RidgeAMD E-Series
Architecture codenameBristol Ridge (2016−2019)Beema (2014)
Release date1 June 2016 (7 years ago)29 April 2014 (10 years ago)
Current price$536 $314

Detailed Specifications

A12-9700P and E1-6010 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed2.5 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz1.35 GHz
L2 cache2048 KB1024 KB
Chip lithography28 nm28 nm
Die size250 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistors3100 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on A12-9700P and E1-6010 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketFP4FT3b
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A12-9700P and E1-6010. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsDual-Channel DDR3/DDR4-1866 Memory Controller, PCIe 3.0 x886x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, Single-Channel DDR3L-1333
AES-NI1+
FMAFMA4FMA4
AVXno data+
FRTC1no data
FreeSync1no data
PowerTune--
DualGraphics1no data
TrueAudio--
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
Out-of-band client management--
VirusProtect-+
RAID-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A12-9700P and E1-6010 are enumerated here.

AMD-V11
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A12-9700P and E1-6010. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4-1866DDR3
Max memory channels21

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R7 GraphicsAMD Radeon R2 Graphics
iGPU core count6no data
Enduro++
Switchable graphics11
UVD++
VCE++

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A12-9700P and E1-6010 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort++
HDMI++

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A12-9700P and E1-6010 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12DirectX® 12
Vulkan11

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A12-9700P and E1-6010.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes8no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

A12-9700P 2446
+362%
E1-6010 530

A12-9700P outperforms E1-6010 by 362% in Passmark.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

A12-9700P 2429
+142%
E1-6010 1006

A12-9700P outperforms E1-6010 by 142% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

A12-9700P 6168
+246%
E1-6010 1784

A12-9700P outperforms E1-6010 by 246% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

A12-9700P 3498
+277%
E1-6010 927

A12-9700P outperforms E1-6010 by 277% in 3DMark06 CPU.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

A12-9700P 2
+285%
E1-6010 1

A12-9700P outperforms E1-6010 by 285% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

A12-9700P 226
+360%
E1-6010 49

A12-9700P outperforms E1-6010 by 360% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

A12-9700P 79
+216%
E1-6010 25

A12-9700P outperforms E1-6010 by 216% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

A12-9700P 0.85
+158%
E1-6010 0.33

A12-9700P outperforms E1-6010 by 158% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

A12-9700P 1.8
+445%
E1-6010 0.3

A12-9700P outperforms E1-6010 by 445% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

A12-9700P 1462
+183%
E1-6010 516

A12-9700P outperforms E1-6010 by 183% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

A12-9700P 85
+350%
E1-6010 19

A12-9700P outperforms E1-6010 by 350% in x264 encoding pass 1.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

A12-9700P 17
+344%
E1-6010 4

A12-9700P outperforms E1-6010 by 344% in x264 encoding pass 2.

Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core

Benchmark coverage: 5%

A12-9700P 2091
+175%
E1-6010 760

A12-9700P outperforms E1-6010 by 175% in Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core.

Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core

Benchmark coverage: 5%

A12-9700P 5464
+313%
E1-6010 1324

A12-9700P outperforms E1-6010 by 313% in Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core.

Pros & Cons Summary


Recency 1 June 2016 29 April 2014
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 10 Watt

We couldn't decide between A12-9700P and E1-6010. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between A12-9700P and E1-6010, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A12-9700P
A12-9700P
AMD E1-6010
E1-6010

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 116 votes

Rate A12-9700P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.2 514 votes

Rate E1-6010 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about A12-9700P or E1-6010, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.