Athlon Silver 3050U vs A12-9700P

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A12-9700P
2016
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
1.58
Athlon Silver 3050U
2020
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
1.93
+22.2%

Athlon Silver 3050U outperforms A12-9700P by a significant 22% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A12-9700P and Athlon Silver 3050U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking20191874
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Bristol RidgeAMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU)
Architecture codenameBristol Ridge (2016−2019)Dali (Zen)
Release date1 June 2016 (8 years ago)7 January 2020 (4 years ago)
Current price$536 $471

Detailed specifications

A12-9700P and Athlon Silver 3050U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed2.5 GHz2.3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz3.2 GHz
L1 cacheno data192 KB
L2 cache2048 KB1 MB
L3 cacheno data4 MB
Chip lithography28 nm14 nm
Die size250 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature90 °C95 °C
Number of transistors3100 Million4500 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on A12-9700P and Athlon Silver 3050U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketFP4FP5
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A12-9700P and Athlon Silver 3050U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsDual-Channel DDR3/DDR4-1866 Memory Controller, PCIe 3.0 x8DDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI1+
FMAFMA4+
AVXno data+
FRTC1no data
FreeSync1no data
PowerTune-no data
DualGraphics1no data
TrueAudio-no data
PowerNow-no data
PowerGating-no data
Out-of-band client management-no data
VirusProtect-no data
RAID-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A12-9700P and Athlon Silver 3050U are enumerated here.

AMD-V1+
IOMMU 2.0-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A12-9700P and Athlon Silver 3050U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4-1866DDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data32 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidthno data38.397 GB/s
ECC memory supportno data+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R7 GraphicsAMD Radeon RX Vega 2
iGPU core count6no data
Enduro+no data
Switchable graphics1no data
UVD+no data
VCE+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A12-9700P and Athlon Silver 3050U integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A12-9700P and Athlon Silver 3050U integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan1no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A12-9700P and Athlon Silver 3050U.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes812

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A12-9700P 1.58
Athlon Silver 3050U 1.93
+22.2%

Athlon Silver 3050U outperforms A12-9700P by 22% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

A12-9700P 2439
Athlon Silver 3050U 2989
+22.6%

Athlon Silver 3050U outperforms A12-9700P by 23% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.58 1.93
Recency 1 June 2016 7 January 2020
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm

The Athlon Silver 3050U is our recommended choice as it beats the A12-9700P in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A12-9700P and Athlon Silver 3050U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A12-9700P
A12-9700P
AMD Athlon Silver 3050U
Athlon Silver 3050U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 118 votes

Rate A12-9700P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 7937 votes

Rate Athlon Silver 3050U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A12-9700P or Athlon Silver 3050U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.