Xeon 5148 vs A110
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 3252 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 3.05 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Power efficiency | no data | 0.45 |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Stealey (2007) | Woodcrest (2006) |
| Release date | June 2007 (18 years ago) | June 2006 (19 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $9 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Basic parameters of A110 and Xeon 5148: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 1 | 2 |
| Boost clock speed | 0.8 GHz | 2.33 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 0 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 4 MB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 65 nm |
| Die size | 66 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 176 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on A110 and Xeon 5148 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | Intel BGA 437 | 771 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 3 Watt | 40 Watt |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A110 and Xeon 5148. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR2 | DDR2 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 1 | 2 |
| Threads | 1 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 3 Watt | 40 Watt |
A110 has 1233% lower power consumption.
Xeon 5148, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 38% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Intel A110 and Intel Xeon 5148. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that A110 is a notebook processor while Xeon 5148 is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
