FX-8370 vs A110

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing A110 and FX-8370 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated1441
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.85
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
Power efficiencyno data2.94
Architecture codenameStealey (2007)Vishera (2012−2015)
Release dateJune 2007 (17 years ago)2 September 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

A110 and FX-8370 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads18
Base clock speedno data4 GHz
Boost clock speed0.8 GHz4.3 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache512 KB (per core)8192 KB
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography90 nm32 nm
Die size66 mm2315 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data61 °C
Number of transistors176 million1,200 million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier-+
P0 Vcore voltageno dataMin: 1.2 V - Max: 1.4 V

Compatibility

Information on A110 and FX-8370 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketIntel BGA 437AM3+
Power consumption (TDP)3 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A110 and FX-8370. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A110 and FX-8370 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A110 and FX-8370. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A110 and FX-8370.

PCIe versionno datan/a

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 8
Threads 1 8
Chip lithography 90 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 3 Watt 125 Watt

A110 has 4066.7% lower power consumption.

FX-8370, on the other hand, has 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 181.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between A110 and FX-8370. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that A110 is a notebook processor while FX-8370 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A110 and FX-8370, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel A110
A110
AMD FX-8370
FX-8370

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2 votes

Rate A110 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 375 votes

Rate FX-8370 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A110 or FX-8370, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.