EPYC 7642 vs A110
Primary details
Comparing A110 and EPYC 7642 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 91 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 5.56 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | no data | AMD EPYC |
| Power efficiency | no data | 15.57 |
| Architecture codename | Stealey (2007) | Zen 2 (2017−2020) |
| Release date | June 2007 (17 years ago) | 7 August 2019 (5 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $4,775 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
A110 and EPYC 7642 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 48 (Octatetraconta-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 96 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 0.8 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| Multiplier | no data | 23 |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 96K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 256 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 7 nm, 14 nm |
| Die size | 66 mm2 | 192 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 176 million | 4,800 million |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on A110 and EPYC 7642 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 2 (Multiprocessor) |
| Socket | Intel BGA 437 | TR4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 3 Watt | 225 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A110 and EPYC 7642. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A110 and EPYC 7642 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A110 and EPYC 7642. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR2 | DDR4 Eight-channel |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 4 TiB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 8 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 204.763 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 1 | 48 |
| Threads | 1 | 96 |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 3 Watt | 225 Watt |
A110 has 7400% lower power consumption.
EPYC 7642, on the other hand, has 4700% more physical cores and 9500% more threads, and a 1185.7% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between A110 and EPYC 7642. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that A110 is a notebook processor while EPYC 7642 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between A110 and EPYC 7642, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
