Celeron Dual-Core T3100 vs A110

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated3008
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Celeron Dual-Core
Power efficiencyno data0.81
DesignerIntelIntel
Architecture codenameStealey (2007)Penryn (2008−2011)
Release dateJune 2007 (18 years ago)1 September 2009 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Basic parameters of A110 and Celeron Dual-Core T3100: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads12
Boost clock speed0.8 GHz1.9 GHz
Bus rateno data800 MHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)128 KB
L2 cache512 KB (per core)1 MB
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography90 nm45 nm
Die size66 mm2107 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Number of transistors176 million410 Million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A110 and Celeron Dual-Core T3100 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketIntel BGA 437BGA479, PGA478
Power consumption (TDP)3 Watt35 Watt

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A110 and Celeron Dual-Core T3100. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2no data

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 2
Threads 1 2
Chip lithography 90 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 3 Watt 35 Watt

A110 has 1067% lower power consumption.

Celeron Dual-Core T3100, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Intel A110 and Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3100. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 4 votes

Rate A110 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 42 votes

Rate Celeron Dual-Core T3100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors A110 and Celeron Dual-Core T3100, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.