EPYC 9634 vs A100
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 27 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 2.28 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | no data | AMD EPYC |
| Power efficiency | no data | 8.97 |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Manufacturer | no data | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Stealey (2007) | Genoa (2022−2023) |
| Release date | June 2007 (18 years ago) | 10 November 2022 (3 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $10,304 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Basic parameters of A100 and EPYC 9634: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 84 |
| Threads | 1 | 168 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.25 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 0.6 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| Multiplier | no data | 22.5 |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 384 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 5 nm, 6 nm |
| Die size | 66 mm2 | 12x 72 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 176 million | 78,840 million |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on A100 and EPYC 9634 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 2 |
| Socket | Intel BGA 437 | SP5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 3 Watt | 290 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A100 and EPYC 9634. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A100 and EPYC 9634 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A100 and EPYC 9634. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR2 | DDR5-4800 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 6 TiB |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 460.8 GB/s |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A100 and EPYC 9634.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 128 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 1 | 84 |
| Threads | 1 | 168 |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 3 Watt | 290 Watt |
A100 has 9567% lower power consumption.
EPYC 9634, on the other hand, has 8300% more physical cores and 16700% more threads, and a 1700% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Intel A100 and AMD EPYC 9634. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that A100 is a notebook processor while EPYC 9634 is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
