EPYC 7502P vs A100
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 201 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 7.99 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | no data | AMD EPYC |
| Power efficiency | no data | 6.86 |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Manufacturer | no data | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Stealey (2007) | Zen 2 (2019−2020) |
| Release date | June 2007 (18 years ago) | 7 August 2019 (6 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $2,300 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
A100 and EPYC 7502P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 32 (Dotriaconta-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 64 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 0.6 GHz | 3.35 GHz |
| Multiplier | no data | 25 |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 96K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 128 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 7 nm, 14 nm |
| Die size | 66 mm2 | 192 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 176 million | 4,800 million |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on A100 and EPYC 7502P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | Intel BGA 437 | TR4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 3 Watt | 180 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A100 and EPYC 7502P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A100 and EPYC 7502P are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A100 and EPYC 7502P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR2 | DDR4 Eight-channel |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 4 TiB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 8 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 204.763 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 1 | 32 |
| Threads | 1 | 64 |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 3 Watt | 180 Watt |
A100 has 5900% lower power consumption.
EPYC 7502P, on the other hand, has 3100% more physical cores and 6300% more threads, and a 1186% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Intel A100 and AMD EPYC 7502P. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that A100 is a notebook processor while EPYC 7502P is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
