Celeron 897 vs A100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing A100 and Celeron 897 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Celeron
Architecture codenameStealey (2007)Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release dateJune 2007 (17 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

A100 and Celeron 897 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads12
Boost clock speed0.6 GHz1.6 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 2.0
Bus rateno data4 × 5 GT/s
Multiplierno data16
L1 cache64 KB (per core)128 KB
L2 cache512 KB (per core)512 KB
L3 cache0 KB2 MB
Chip lithography90 nm32 nm
Die size66 mm2131 mm2
Number of transistors176 million504 Million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A100 and Celeron 897 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketIntel BGA 437no data
Power consumption (TDP)3 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A100 and Celeron 897. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

FMA-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A100 and Celeron 897 are enumerated here.

VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A100 and Celeron 897. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2DDR3-1333
Maximum memory sizeno data16 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data21.335 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 2
Threads 1 2
Chip lithography 90 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 3 Watt 17 Watt

A100 has 466.7% lower power consumption.

Celeron 897, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 181.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between A100 and Celeron 897. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between A100 and Celeron 897, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel A100
A100
Intel Celeron 897
Celeron 897

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate A100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 1 vote

Rate Celeron 897 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A100 or Celeron 897, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.