A6-9220e vs A10 Pro-7350B

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A10 Pro-7350B
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 19 Watt
1.24
+96.8%

A10 Pro-7350B outperforms A6-9220e by an impressive 97% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A10 Pro-7350B and A6-9220e processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking22222673
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD KaveriAMD Bristol Ridge
Architecture codenameKaveri (2014−2015)Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date4 June 2014 (10 years ago)1 June 2017 (7 years ago)
Current price$338 $308

Detailed specifications

A10 Pro-7350B and A6-9220e basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed2.1 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz2.4 GHz
L1 cacheno data160 KB
L2 cache4096 KB1 MB
Chip lithography28 nm28 nm
Die size245 mm2124.5 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
Number of transistors2410 Million1200 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on A10 Pro-7350B and A6-9220e compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketFP3BGA
Power consumption (TDP)19 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10 Pro-7350B and A6-9220e. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA, DDR3-1600 ControllerSingle-Channel DDR4-2133, Virtualization,
AES-NI+no data
FMA+no data
AVX+no data
FRTC1no data
PowerTune-no data
TrueAudio+no data
PowerNow+no data
PowerGating+no data
Out-of-band client management+no data
VirusProtect+no data
RAID+no data
HSA1no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10 Pro-7350B and A6-9220e are enumerated here.

AMD-V1+
IOMMU 2.0+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10 Pro-7350B and A6-9220e. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1600DDR4
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R6 GraphicsAMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)
iGPU core count6no data
Number of pipelines384no data
Enduro+no data
Switchable graphics1no data
UVD+no data
VCE+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A10 Pro-7350B and A6-9220e integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A10 Pro-7350B and A6-9220e integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan1no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10 Pro-7350B and A6-9220e.

PCIe version3.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A10 Pro-7350B 1.24
+96.8%
A6-9220e 0.63

A10 Pro-7350B outperforms A6-9220e by 97% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

A10 Pro-7350B 1921
+97.8%
A6-9220e 971

A10 Pro-7350B outperforms A6-9220e by 98% in Passmark.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

A10 Pro-7350B 2004
+89.7%
A6-9220e 1056

A10 Pro-7350B outperforms A6-9220e by 90% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

A10 Pro-7350B 5276
+203%
A6-9220e 1741

A10 Pro-7350B outperforms A6-9220e by 203% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

A10 Pro-7350B 23.29
+51.1%
A6-9220e 35.2

A6-9220e outperforms A10 Pro-7350B by 51% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

A10 Pro-7350B 162
+88.4%
A6-9220e 86

A10 Pro-7350B outperforms A6-9220e by 88% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

A10 Pro-7350B 55
+77.4%
A6-9220e 31

A10 Pro-7350B outperforms A6-9220e by 77% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

A10 Pro-7350B 1.2
+238%
A6-9220e 0.3

A10 Pro-7350B outperforms A6-9220e by 238% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

A10 Pro-7350B 1484
+186%
A6-9220e 519

A10 Pro-7350B outperforms A6-9220e by 186% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

A10 Pro-7350B 12
+356%
A6-9220e 3

A10 Pro-7350B outperforms A6-9220e by 356% in x264 encoding pass 2.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

A10 Pro-7350B 68
+363%
A6-9220e 15

A10 Pro-7350B outperforms A6-9220e by 363% in x264 encoding pass 1.

Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core

Benchmark coverage: 5%

A10 Pro-7350B 3869
+101%
A6-9220e 1929

A10 Pro-7350B outperforms A6-9220e by 101% in Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core.

Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core

Benchmark coverage: 5%

A10 Pro-7350B 1449
+16.2%
A6-9220e 1247

A10 Pro-7350B outperforms A6-9220e by 16% in Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core.

Geekbench 2

Benchmark coverage: 5%

A10 Pro-7350B 3814
+19.5%
A6-9220e 3192

A10 Pro-7350B outperforms A6-9220e by 19% in Geekbench 2.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.24 0.63
Recency 4 June 2014 1 June 2017
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Power consumption (TDP) 19 Watt 6 Watt

The A10 Pro-7350B is our recommended choice as it beats the A6-9220e in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A10 Pro-7350B and A6-9220e, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A10 Pro-7350B
A10 Pro-7350B
AMD A6-9220e
A6-9220e

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 31 vote

Rate A10 Pro-7350B on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 305 votes

Rate A6-9220e on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A10 Pro-7350B or A6-9220e, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.