Atom x7405C vs A10 PRO-7850B
Primary details
Comparing A10 PRO-7850B and Atom x7405C processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in performance ranking | 1809 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
Architecture codename | Kaveri (2014−2015) | Amston Lake (2024) |
Release date | 31 July 2014 (10 years ago) | 8 April 2024 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
A10 PRO-7850B and Atom x7405C basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
Threads | 4 | 4 |
Base clock speed | 3.7 GHz | 1.7 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 4 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
L1 cache | 256 KB | 96 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 4096 KB | 2 MB (shared) |
L3 cache | no data | 6 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 28 nm | 10 nm |
Die size | 245 mm2 | no data |
Maximum core temperature | 72 °C | no data |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 74 °C | no data |
Number of transistors | 2,411 million | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on A10 PRO-7850B and Atom x7405C compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Socket | FM2+ | Intel BGA 1264 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 12 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10 PRO-7850B and Atom x7405C. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
AES-NI | + | + |
FMA | + | - |
AVX | + | + |
PowerTune | + | - |
DualGraphics | + | - |
TrueAudio | + | - |
PowerNow | + | - |
PowerGating | + | - |
Out-of-band client management | + | - |
VirusProtect | + | - |
RAID | + | - |
HSA | + | - |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10 PRO-7850B and Atom x7405C are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | - |
VT-d | no data | + |
VT-x | no data | + |
IOMMU 2.0 | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10 PRO-7850B and Atom x7405C. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3-2133 | DDR4, DDR5 |
Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon R7 Graphics | N/A |
iGPU core count | 8 | no data |
Number of pipelines | 512 | no data |
UVD | + | - |
VCE | + | - |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of A10 PRO-7850B and Atom x7405C integrated GPUs.
DisplayPort | + | - |
HDMI | + | - |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by A10 PRO-7850B and Atom x7405C integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
DirectX | DirectX® 12 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10 PRO-7850B and Atom x7405C.
PCIe version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
PCI Express lanes | 16 | 9 |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 31 July 2014 | 8 April 2024 |
Chip lithography | 28 nm | 10 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 12 Watt |
Atom x7405C has an age advantage of 9 years, a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 691.7% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between A10 PRO-7850B and Atom x7405C. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that A10 PRO-7850B is a desktop processor while Atom x7405C is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between A10 PRO-7850B and Atom x7405C, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.