PRO A6-9500 vs A10 PRO-7800B

VS

Aggregate performance score

A10 PRO-7800B
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
2.08
+85.7%
PRO A6-9500
2016
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
1.12

A10 PRO-7800B outperforms PRO A6-9500 by an impressive 86% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A10 PRO-7800B and PRO A6-9500 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking18962402
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency3.011.62
Architecture codenameKaveri (2014−2015)Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date31 July 2014 (10 years ago)3 October 2016 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A10 PRO-7800B and PRO A6-9500 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed3.5 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz3.8 GHz
L1 cache256 KBno data
L2 cache4096 KB1024 KB
Chip lithography28 nm28 nm
Die size245 mm2250 mm2
Maximum core temperature71 °C90 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °Cno data
Number of transistors2,411 million3,100 million
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on A10 PRO-7800B and PRO A6-9500 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM2+AM4
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10 PRO-7800B and PRO A6-9500. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++
FRTC-+
FreeSync-+
PowerTune++
TrueAudio++
PowerNow++
PowerGating++
Out-of-band client management++
VirusProtect++
RAID+-
HSA+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10 PRO-7800B and PRO A6-9500 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10 PRO-7800B and PRO A6-9500. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-2133DDR4-2400
Max memory channels22

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R7 GraphicsAMD Radeon R5 Graphics
iGPU core count86
จำนวนพาธไลน์512no data
Enduro-+
UVD++
VCE++

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A10 PRO-7800B and PRO A6-9500 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort++
HDMI++

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A10 PRO-7800B and PRO A6-9500 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12DirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10 PRO-7800B and PRO A6-9500.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes168

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A10 PRO-7800B 2.08
+85.7%
PRO A6-9500 1.12

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A10 PRO-7800B 3303
+85.1%
PRO A6-9500 1784

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

A10 PRO-7800B 445
PRO A6-9500 602
+35.3%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

A10 PRO-7800B 1079
+22.3%
PRO A6-9500 882

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.08 1.12
Recency 31 July 2014 3 October 2016
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2

A10 PRO-7800B has a 85.7% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

PRO A6-9500, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years.

The A10 PRO-7800B is our recommended choice as it beats the PRO A6-9500 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A10 PRO-7800B and PRO A6-9500, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A10 PRO-7800B
A10 PRO-7800B
AMD PRO A6-9500
PRO A6-9500

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 230 votes

Rate A10 PRO-7800B on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 4 votes

Rate PRO A6-9500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A10 PRO-7800B or PRO A6-9500, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.