Xeon E5620 vs A10-9700

Primary details

Comparing A10-9700 and Xeon E5620 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking	1719	1727
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	3.64	0.08
Market segment	Desktop processor	Server
Architecture codename	Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)	Westmere-EP (2010−2011)
Release date	27 July 2017 (6 years ago)	16 March 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$90	$35
Current price	$75 (0.8x MSRP)	$48 (1.4x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

A10-9700 has 4450% better value for money than Xeon E5620.

Detailed specifications

A10-9700 and Xeon E5620 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	4 (Quad-Core)	4 (Quad-Core)
Threads	4	8
Base clock speed	3.5 GHz	2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed	3.8 GHz	2.66 GHz
L1 cache	no data	64 KB (per core)
L2 cache	2048 KB	256 KB (per core)
L3 cache	0 KB	12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography	28 nm	32 nm
Die size	246 mm2	239 mm2
Maximum core temperature	90 °C	78 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)	74 °C	no data
Number of transistors	1,178 million	1,170 million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-
Unlocked multiplier	No	No

Compatibility

Information on A10-9700 and Xeon E5620 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	2
Socket	AM4	FCLGA1366,LGA1366
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	80 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-9700 and Xeon E5620. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	no data	Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI	+	+
FMA	+	no data
AVX	+	no data
FRTC	1	no data
FreeSync	1	no data
PowerTune	+	no data
TrueAudio	+	no data
PowerNow	+	no data
PowerGating	+	no data
VirusProtect	+	no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	no data	+
Turbo Boost Technology	no data	1.0
Hyper-Threading Technology	no data	+
Idle States	no data	+
Thermal Monitoring	no data	-
Demand Based Switching	no data	+
PAE	no data	40 Bit
Status	no data	Discontinued

Security technologies

A10-9700 and Xeon E5620 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	no data	+
EDB	no data	+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-9700 and Xeon E5620 are enumerated here.

AMD-V	+	no data
VT-d	no data	+
VT-x	no data	+
EPT	no data	+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-9700 and Xeon E5620. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR4-2400	DDR3
Maximum memory size	no data	288 GB
Max memory channels	2	3
Maximum memory bandwidth	no data	25.6 GB/s
ECC memory support	no data	+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card	AMD Radeon R7 Graphics	no data
iGPU core count	6	no data
Enduro	+	no data
UVD	+	no data
VCE	+	no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A10-9700 and Xeon E5620 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort	+	no data
HDMI	+	no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A10-9700 and Xeon E5620 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX	DirectX® 12	no data
Vulkan	1	no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10-9700 and Xeon E5620.

PCIe version	3.0	2.0
PCI Express lanes	8	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A10-9700 outperforms Xeon E5620 by 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Performance score	2.29	2.27
Recency	27 July 2017	16 March 2010
Threads	4	8
Cost	$90	$35
Chip lithography	28 nm	32 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	80 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between A10-9700 and Xeon E5620, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---