Turion II Ultra M660 vs A10-9700

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A10-9700
2017, $90
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
2.03
+256%
Turion II Ultra M660
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.57

A10-9700 outperforms Turion II Ultra M660 by a whopping 256% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking21383110
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.64no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Turion II Ultra
Power efficiency1.320.69
DesignerAMDAMD
ManufacturerGlobalFoundriesno data
Architecture codenameBristol Ridge (2016−2019)Caspian (2009)
Release date27 July 2017 (8 years ago)10 September 2009 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$90no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

A10-9700 and Turion II Ultra M660 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed3.5 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz2.7 GHz
Bus rateno data3600 MHz
L2 cache2048 KB2 MB
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography28 nm45 nm
Die size250 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °Cno data
Number of transistors3,100 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A10-9700 and Turion II Ultra M660 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketAM4Socket S1 (s1g3) 638-pin
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-9700 and Turion II Ultra M660. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD Virtualization
AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
PowerTune+-
TrueAudio+-
PowerNow++
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-9700 and Turion II Ultra M660 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-9700 and Turion II Ultra M660. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR2
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R7 Graphicsno data
iGPU core count6no data
Enduro+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A10-9700 and Turion II Ultra M660 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A10-9700 and Turion II Ultra M660 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10-9700 and Turion II Ultra M660.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes8no data

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.03 0.57
Recency 27 July 2017 10 September 2009
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 28 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 35 Watt

A10-9700 has a 256.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 60.7% more advanced lithography process.

Turion II Ultra M660, on the other hand, has 85.7% lower power consumption.

The AMD A10-9700 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Turion II Ultra M660 in performance tests.

Note that A10-9700 is a desktop processor while Turion II Ultra M660 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A10-9700
A10-9700
AMD Turion II Ultra M660
Turion II Ultra M660

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 446 votes

Rate A10-9700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 4 votes

Rate Turion II Ultra M660 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors A10-9700 and Turion II Ultra M660, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.