EPYC 4564P vs A10-9700

VS

Aggregate performance score

A10-9700
2017
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
2.23
EPYC 4564P
2024
16 cores / 32 threads, 170 Watt
39.07
+1652%

EPYC 4564P outperforms A10-9700 by a whopping 1652% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A10-9700 and EPYC 4564P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking182572
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.6453.47
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency3.2521.75
Architecture codenameBristol Ridge (2016−2019)Raphael (2023−2024)
Release date27 July 2017 (7 years ago)21 May 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$90$699

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 4564P has 1369% better value for money than A10-9700.

Detailed specifications

A10-9700 and EPYC 4564P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads432
Base clock speed3.5 GHz4.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz5.7 GHz
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cache2048 KB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm5 nm
Die size250 mm22x 71 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °C47 °C
Number of transistors3,100 million13,140 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on A10-9700 and EPYC 4564P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM4AM5
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt170 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-9700 and EPYC 4564P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
PowerTune+-
TrueAudio+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-9700 and EPYC 4564P are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-9700 and EPYC 4564P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR5
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R7 GraphicsAMD Radeon Graphics
iGPU core count6no data
Enduro+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A10-9700 and EPYC 4564P integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A10-9700 and EPYC 4564P integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10-9700 and EPYC 4564P.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes828

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A10-9700 2.23
EPYC 4564P 39.07
+1652%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A10-9700 3547
EPYC 4564P 62061
+1650%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.23 39.07
Recency 27 July 2017 21 May 2024
Physical cores 4 16
Threads 4 32
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 170 Watt

A10-9700 has 161.5% lower power consumption.

EPYC 4564P, on the other hand, has a 1652% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 4564P is our recommended choice as it beats the A10-9700 in performance tests.

Note that A10-9700 is a desktop processor while EPYC 4564P is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A10-9700 and EPYC 4564P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A10-9700
A10-9700
AMD EPYC 4564P
EPYC 4564P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 413 votes

Rate A10-9700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 2 votes

Rate EPYC 4564P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A10-9700 or EPYC 4564P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.