Core i7-10700F vs A10-9700

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A10-9700
2017
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
2.29
Core i7-10700F
2020
8 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
10.62
+364%

i7-10700F outperforms A10-9700 by a whopping 364% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A10-9700 and Core i7-10700F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1726683
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.6422.73
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Architecture codenameBristol Ridge (2016−2019)Comet Lake (2020)
Release date27 July 2017 (6 years ago)30 April 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$90no data
Current price$75 (0.8x MSRP)$274

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i7-10700F has 524% better value for money than A10-9700.

Detailed specifications

A10-9700 and Core i7-10700F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads416
Base clock speed3.5 GHz2.9 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz4.8 GHz
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cache2048 KB256K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm14 nm
Die size246 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature90 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °C72 °C
Number of transistors1,178 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on A10-9700 and Core i7-10700F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM4FCLGA1200
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-9700 and Core i7-10700F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
FMA+no data
AVX++
FRTC1no data
FreeSync1no data
PowerTune+no data
TrueAudio+no data
PowerNow+no data
PowerGating+no data
VirusProtect+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSXno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoringno data+
SIPPno data-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Statusno dataDiscontinued

Security technologies

A10-9700 and Core i7-10700F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protectionno data+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-9700 and Core i7-10700F are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-9700 and Core i7-10700F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR4-2933
Maximum memory sizeno data128 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidthno data45.8 GB/s
ECC memory supportno data-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R7 Graphicsno data
iGPU core count6no data
Enduro+no data
UVD+no data
VCE+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A10-9700 and Core i7-10700F integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A10-9700 and Core i7-10700F integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan1no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10-9700 and Core i7-10700F.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes816

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A10-9700 2.29
i7-10700F 10.62
+364%

Core i7-10700F outperforms A10-9700 by 364% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

A10-9700 3548
i7-10700F 16422
+363%

Core i7-10700F outperforms A10-9700 by 363% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

A10-9700 650
i7-10700F 1618
+149%

Core i7-10700F outperforms A10-9700 by 149% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

A10-9700 1588
i7-10700F 7261
+357%

Core i7-10700F outperforms A10-9700 by 357% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.29 10.62
Recency 27 July 2017 30 April 2020
Physical cores 4 8
Threads 4 16
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm

The Core i7-10700F is our recommended choice as it beats the A10-9700 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A10-9700 and Core i7-10700F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A10-9700
A10-9700
Intel Core i7-10700F
Core i7-10700F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 392 votes

Rate A10-9700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1015 votes

Rate Core i7-10700F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A10-9700 or Core i7-10700F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.