Athlon 64 3600+ vs A10-9700

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

General info

Comparing A10-9700 and Athlon 64 3600+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1696not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money3.64no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Architecture codenameBristol Ridge (2016−2019)Clawhammer (2001−2005)
Release date27 July 2017 (6 years ago)June 2004 (19 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$90no data
Current price$75 (0.8x MSRP)$70

Value for money

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Technical specs

A10-9700 and Athlon 64 3600+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads41
Base clock speed3.5 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz2.4 GHz
L1 cacheno data128K
L2 cache2048 KB1 MB
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography28 nm130 nm
Die size246 mm2193 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °C70 °C
Number of transistors1,178 million106 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on A10-9700 and Athlon 64 3600+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM4754
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt89 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-9700 and Athlon 64 3600+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+no data
FMA+no data
AVX+no data
FRTC1no data
FreeSync1no data
PowerTune+no data
TrueAudio+no data
PowerNow+no data
PowerGating+no data
VirusProtect+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-9700 and Athlon 64 3600+ are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-9700 and Athlon 64 3600+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR1
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R7 Graphicsno data
iGPU core count6no data
Enduro+no data
UVD+no data
VCE+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A10-9700 and Athlon 64 3600+ integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A10-9700 and Athlon 64 3600+ integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan1no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10-9700 and Athlon 64 3600+.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes8no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

A10-9700 3544
+490%
Athlon 64 3600+ 601

A10-9700 outperforms Athlon 64 3600+ by 490% in Passmark.

Advantages and disadvantages


Physical cores 4 1
Threads 4 1
Chip lithography 28 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 89 Watt

We couldn't decide between A10-9700 and Athlon 64 3600+. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between A10-9700 and Athlon 64 3600+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A10-9700
A10-9700
AMD Athlon 64 3600+
Athlon 64 3600+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 385 votes

Rate A10-9700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 3 votes

Rate Athlon 64 3600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about A10-9700 or Athlon 64 3600+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.