A8-7680 vs A10-9700

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

A10-9700
2017
4 cores / 4 threads
2.29

General info

Comparing A10-9700 and A8-7680 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking16951699
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money3.6415.78
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Architecture codenameBristol Ridge (2016−2019)Godaveri (2014−2018)
Release date27 July 2017 (6 years ago)26 October 2018 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$90no data
Current price$75 (0.8x MSRP)$53

Value for money

Performance per price, higher is better.

A8-7680 has 334% better value for money than A10-9700.

Technical specs

A10-9700 and A8-7680 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed3.5 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz3.8 GHz
L1 cacheno data128K (per core)
L2 cache2048 KB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography28 nm28 nm
Die size246 mm2246 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °C74 °C
Number of transistors1,178 million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on A10-9700 and A8-7680 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM4FM2+
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-9700 and A8-7680. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+no data
FMA+no data
AVX+no data
FRTC1no data
FreeSync1no data
PowerTune+no data
TrueAudio+no data
PowerNow+no data
PowerGating+no data
VirusProtect+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-9700 and A8-7680 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-9700 and A8-7680. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR3
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R7 GraphicsRadeon R7
iGPU core count6no data
Enduro+no data
UVD+no data
VCE+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A10-9700 and A8-7680 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A10-9700 and A8-7680 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan1no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10-9700 and A8-7680.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes8no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A10-9700 2.29
A8-7680 2.29

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

A10-9700 3544
+0.2%
A8-7680 3537

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Recency 27 July 2017 26 October 2018
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 45 Watt

We couldn't decide between A10-9700 and A8-7680. The differences in performance seem too small.


Should you still have questions on choice between A10-9700 and A8-7680, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A10-9700
A10-9700
AMD A8-7680
A8-7680

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 385 votes

Rate A10-9700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 474 votes

Rate A8-7680 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about A10-9700 or A8-7680, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.