A10-9620P vs A10-9700

Primary details

Comparing A10-9700 and A10-9620P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking	1699	1957
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	3.64	no data
Market segment	Desktop processor	Laptop
Series	no data	Bristol Ridge
Architecture codename	Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)	Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date	27 July 2017 (6 years ago)	1 January 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$90	no data
Current price	$75 (0.8x MSRP)	$886

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Detailed specifications

A10-9700 and A10-9620P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	4 (Quad-Core)	4 (Quad-Core)
Threads	4	4
Base clock speed	3.5 GHz	2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed	3.8 GHz	3.4 GHz
L2 cache	2048 KB	2 MB
L3 cache	0 KB	no data
Chip lithography	28 nm	28 nm
Die size	246 mm2	250 mm2
Maximum core temperature	90 °C	90 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)	74 °C	no data
Number of transistors	1,178 million	3100 Million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-
Unlocked multiplier	No	No

Compatibility

Information on A10-9700 and A10-9620P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	no data
Socket	AM4	FP4
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-9700 and A10-9620P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	no data	Dual-Channel DDR3/DDR4-1866 Memory Controller, PCIe 3.0 x8
AES-NI	+	no data
FMA	+	no data
AVX	+	no data
FRTC	1	no data
FreeSync	1	no data
PowerTune	+	no data
TrueAudio	+	no data
PowerNow	+	no data
PowerGating	+	no data
VirusProtect	+	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-9700 and A10-9620P are enumerated here.

AMD-V

+

no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-9700 and A10-9620P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR4-2400	DDR3, DDR4
Max memory channels	2	no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card Compare	AMD Radeon R7 Graphics	AMD Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
iGPU core count	6	no data
Enduro	+	no data
UVD	+	no data
VCE	+	no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A10-9700 and A10-9620P integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort	+	no data
HDMI	+	no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A10-9700 and A10-9620P integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX	DirectX® 12	no data
Vulkan	1	no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10-9700 and A10-9620P.

PCIe version	3.0	no data
PCI Express lanes	8	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A10-9700 outperforms A10-9620P by 38% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Performance score	2.29	1.66
Integrated graphics card		2.45
Recency	27 July 2017	1 January 2017
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	15 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between A10-9700 and A10-9620P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---