Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 vs A10-9620P
Primary details
Comparing A10-9620P and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in performance ranking | 1986 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | Bristol Ridge | 2x AMD Turion Ultra |
Architecture codename | Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) | Puma (2008−2009) |
Release date | 1 January 2017 (7 years ago) | 4 June 2008 (16 years ago) |
Current price | $886 | $72 |
Detailed specifications
A10-9620P and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 4 | 2 |
Base clock speed | 2.5 GHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 3.4 GHz | 2.3 GHz |
Bus support | no data | 3600 MHz |
L1 cache | no data | 256 KB |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
L3 cache | no data | 0 KB |
Chip lithography | 28 nm | 65 nm |
Die size | 250 mm2 | no data |
Maximum core temperature | 90 °C | no data |
Number of transistors | 3100 Million | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on A10-9620P and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
Socket | FP4 | S1g2 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-9620P and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | Dual-Channel DDR3/DDR4-1866 Memory Controller, PCIe 3.0 x8 | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD Virtualization, Dual Channel DDR2 memory controller |
PowerNow | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-9620P and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 are enumerated here.
AMD-V | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-9620P and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3, DDR4 | DDR2 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
A10-9620P outperforms Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 by 141% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
A10-9620P outperforms Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 by 164% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.
Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.
Benchmark coverage: 20%
A10-9620P outperforms Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 by 21% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.
Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.
Benchmark coverage: 19%
A10-9620P outperforms Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 by 105% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 1 January 2017 | 4 June 2008 |
Physical cores | 4 | 2 |
Threads | 4 | 2 |
Chip lithography | 28 nm | 65 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 35 Watt |
We couldn't decide between A10-9620P and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between A10-9620P and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.