Ryzen 7 7735U vs A10-9620P

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A10-9620P
2017
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
1.65
Ryzen 7 7735U
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 28 Watt
13.77
+735%

Ryzen 7 7735U outperforms A10-9620P by a whopping 735% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A10-9620P and Ryzen 7 7735U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1986502
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesBristol Ridgeno data
Architecture codenameBristol Ridge (2016−2019)Rembrandt-U Refresh
Release date1 January 2017 (7 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Current price$886 no data

Detailed specifications

A10-9620P and Ryzen 7 7735U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads416
Base clock speed2.5 GHz2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz4.75 GHz
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cache2 MB512K (per core)
L3 cacheno data16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm6 nm
Die size250 mm2208 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C95 °C
Number of transistors3100 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on A10-9620P and Ryzen 7 7735U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFP4FP7
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-9620P and Ryzen 7 7735U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsDual-Channel DDR3/DDR4-1866 Memory Controller, PCIe 3.0 x8DDR5-4800/LPDDR5-6400 RAM (incl. ECC), PCIe 4, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NIno data+
FMAno data+
AVXno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-9620P and Ryzen 7 7735U are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-9620P and Ryzen 7 7735U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)AMD Radeon 680M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10-9620P and Ryzen 7 7735U.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A10-9620P 1.65
Ryzen 7 7735U 13.77
+735%

Ryzen 7 7735U outperforms A10-9620P by 735% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

A10-9620P 2559
Ryzen 7 7735U 21304
+733%

Ryzen 7 7735U outperforms A10-9620P by 733% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

A10-9620P 499
Ryzen 7 7735U 1793
+259%

Ryzen 7 7735U outperforms A10-9620P by 259% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

A10-9620P 1099
Ryzen 7 7735U 7752
+605%

Ryzen 7 7735U outperforms A10-9620P by 605% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

A10-9620P 2277
Ryzen 7 7735U 6207
+173%

Ryzen 7 7735U outperforms A10-9620P by 173% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

A10-9620P 7420
Ryzen 7 7735U 32220
+334%

Ryzen 7 7735U outperforms A10-9620P by 334% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

A10-9620P 14.41
Ryzen 7 7735U 5.18
+178%

A10-9620P outperforms Ryzen 7 7735U by 178% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

A10-9620P 3
Ryzen 7 7735U 19
+631%

Ryzen 7 7735U outperforms A10-9620P by 631% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

A10-9620P 230
Ryzen 7 7735U 1698
+638%

Ryzen 7 7735U outperforms A10-9620P by 638% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

A10-9620P 72
Ryzen 7 7735U 234
+225%

Ryzen 7 7735U outperforms A10-9620P by 225% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

A10-9620P 0.81
Ryzen 7 7735U 2.8
+246%

Ryzen 7 7735U outperforms A10-9620P by 246% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

A10-9620P 1329
Ryzen 7 7735U 4904
+269%

Ryzen 7 7735U outperforms A10-9620P by 269% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

A10-9620P 16
Ryzen 7 7735U 91
+456%

Ryzen 7 7735U outperforms A10-9620P by 456% in x264 encoding pass 2.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

A10-9620P 77
Ryzen 7 7735U 229
+198%

Ryzen 7 7735U outperforms A10-9620P by 198% in x264 encoding pass 1.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.65 13.77
Integrated graphics card 2.45 17.36
Recency 1 January 2017 4 January 2023
Physical cores 4 8
Threads 4 16
Chip lithography 28 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 28 Watt

The Ryzen 7 7735U is our recommended choice as it beats the A10-9620P in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A10-9620P and Ryzen 7 7735U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A10-9620P
A10-9620P
AMD Ryzen 7 7735U
Ryzen 7 7735U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 284 votes

Rate A10-9620P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 84 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 7735U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A10-9620P or Ryzen 7 7735U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.