i5-750 vs A10-9620P

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A10-9620P
2017
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
1.60
+0.6%
Core i5-750
2009
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
1.59

A10-9620P outperforms Core i5-750 by a minimal 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A10-9620P and Core i5-750 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking21062107
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.20
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesBristol RidgeCore i5 (Desktop)
Power efficiency10.091.58
Architecture codenameBristol Ridge (2016−2019)Lynnfield (2009−2010)
Release date1 January 2017 (7 years ago)8 September 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$150

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

A10-9620P and Core i5-750 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2.5 GHz2.66 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz3.2 GHz
Bus rateno data2500 MHz
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB256 KB (per core)
L3 cacheno data8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm45 nm
Die size250 mm2296 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C73 °C
Number of transistors3100 Million774 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A10-9620P and Core i5-750 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFP4FCLGA1156,LGA1156
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-9620P and Core i5-750. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data1.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Demand Based Switchingno data-
PAEno data36 Bit

Security technologies

A10-9620P and Core i5-750 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-9620P and Core i5-750 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-9620P and Core i5-750. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data16 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data21 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) ( - 758 MHz)N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10-9620P and Core i5-750.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A10-9620P 1.60
+0.6%
i5-750 1.59

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A10-9620P 2538
+0.2%
i5-750 2533

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

A10-9620P 500
+18.8%
i5-750 421

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

A10-9620P 1112
i5-750 1171
+5.3%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

A10-9620P 2277
i5-750 3458
+51.9%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

A10-9620P 7420
i5-750 11048
+48.9%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

A10-9620P 14.41
i5-750 12.06
+19.5%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

A10-9620P 3
i5-750 4
+41.4%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.60 1.59
Recency 1 January 2017 8 September 2009
Chip lithography 28 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 95 Watt

A10-9620P has a 0.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 60.7% more advanced lithography process, and 533.3% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between A10-9620P and Core i5-750.

Be aware that A10-9620P is a notebook processor while Core i5-750 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A10-9620P and Core i5-750, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A10-9620P
A10-9620P
Intel Core i5-750
Core i5-750

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 313 votes

Rate A10-9620P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 993 votes

Rate Core i5-750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A10-9620P or Core i5-750, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.