Athlon II X4 630 vs A10-9620P

VS

Aggregate performance score

A10-9620P
2017
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
1.60
+17.6%
Athlon II X4 630
2009
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
1.36

A10-9620P outperforms Athlon II X4 630 by a moderate 18% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A10-9620P and Athlon II X4 630 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking21062248
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data6.02
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesBristol Ridgeno data
Power efficiency10.091.35
Architecture codenameBristol Ridge (2016−2019)Propus (2009−2011)
Release date1 January 2017 (7 years ago)16 September 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$63

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

A10-9620P and Athlon II X4 630 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2.5 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz2.8 GHz
L1 cacheno data128 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB512 KB (per core)
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography28 nm45 nm
Die size250 mm2169 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistors3100 Million300 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A10-9620P and Athlon II X4 630 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFP4AM3
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt95 Watt

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-9620P and Athlon II X4 630. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) ( - 758 MHz)On certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10-9620P and Athlon II X4 630.

PCIe versionno data2.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A10-9620P 1.60
+17.6%
Athlon II X4 630 1.36

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A10-9620P 2538
+17.7%
Athlon II X4 630 2157

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

A10-9620P 500
+68.4%
Athlon II X4 630 297

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

A10-9620P 1112
+24.7%
Athlon II X4 630 892

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.60 1.36
Recency 1 January 2017 16 September 2009
Chip lithography 28 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 95 Watt

A10-9620P has a 17.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 60.7% more advanced lithography process, and 533.3% lower power consumption.

The A10-9620P is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon II X4 630 in performance tests.

Be aware that A10-9620P is a notebook processor while Athlon II X4 630 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A10-9620P and Athlon II X4 630, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A10-9620P
A10-9620P
AMD Athlon II X4 630
Athlon II X4 630

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 313 votes

Rate A10-9620P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 325 votes

Rate Athlon II X4 630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A10-9620P or Athlon II X4 630, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.