EPYC 9654 vs A10-9600P

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

A10-9600P
2016
4 cores / 4 threads
1.48
EPYC 9654
2022
96 cores / 192 threads
77.72
+5151%

EPYC 9654 outperforms A10-9600P by 5151% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary Details

Comparing A10-9600P and EPYC 9654 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking20254
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluationno data10.18
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD Bristol RidgeAMD EPYC
Architecture codenameBristol Ridge (2016−2019)Genoa
Release date1 June 2016 (7 years ago)10 November 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$11,805
Current price$494 $4544 (0.4x MSRP)

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed Specifications

A10-9600P and EPYC 9654 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)96
Threads4192
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz3.7 GHz
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cache2048 KB1 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data384 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die size250 mm212x 72 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistors3100 Million78,840 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on A10-9600P and EPYC 9654 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2
SocketFP4SP5
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt360 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-9600P and EPYC 9654. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsDual-Channel DDR3/DDR4-1866 Memory Controller, PCIe 3.0 x8no data
AES-NI1+
FMAFMA4no data
AVXno data+
FRTC1no data
FreeSync1no data
PowerTune-no data
DualGraphics1no data
TrueAudio-no data
PowerNow-no data
PowerGating-no data
Out-of-band client management-no data
VirusProtect-no data
RAID-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-9600P and EPYC 9654 are enumerated here.

AMD-V1+
IOMMU 2.0-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-9600P and EPYC 9654. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4-1866DDR5-4800
Maximum memory sizeno data6 TiB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidthno data460.8 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R5 Graphicsno data
iGPU core count6no data
Enduro+no data
Switchable graphics1no data
UVD+no data
VCE+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A10-9600P and EPYC 9654 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A10-9600P and EPYC 9654 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan1no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10-9600P and EPYC 9654.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes8128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A10-9600P 1.48
EPYC 9654 77.72
+5151%

EPYC 9654 outperforms A10-9600P by 5151% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

A10-9600P 2330
EPYC 9654 122091
+5140%

EPYC 9654 outperforms A10-9600P by 5140% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

A10-9600P 456
EPYC 9654 1829
+301%

EPYC 9654 outperforms A10-9600P by 301% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

A10-9600P 1027
EPYC 9654 18566
+1708%

EPYC 9654 outperforms A10-9600P by 1708% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & Cons Summary


Performance score 1.48 77.72
Recency 1 June 2016 10 November 2022
Physical cores 4 96
Threads 4 192
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 360 Watt

The EPYC 9654 is our recommended choice as it beats the A10-9600P in performance tests.

Be aware that A10-9600P is a notebook processor while EPYC 9654 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A10-9600P and EPYC 9654, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A10-9600P
A10-9600P
AMD EPYC 9654
EPYC 9654

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 296 votes

Rate A10-9600P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 979 votes

Rate EPYC 9654 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about A10-9600P or EPYC 9654, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.