Ultra 7 265F vs A10-9600P

Primary details

Comparing A10-9600P and Core Ultra 7 265F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2217not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Bristol Ridgeno data
Power efficiency9.27no data
Architecture codenameBristol Ridge (2016−2019)Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release date1 June 2016 (8 years ago)7 January 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$379

Detailed specifications

A10-9600P and Core Ultra 7 265F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)20 (Icosa-Core)
Performance-coresno data8
Efficient-coresno data12
Threads420
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz5.3 GHz
L1 cacheno data112 KB (per core)
L2 cache2048 KB3 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data30 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm3 nm
Die size250 mm2243 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistors3100 Million17,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on A10-9600P and Core Ultra 7 265F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFP4FCLGA1851
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-9600P and Core Ultra 7 265F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
FMAFMA4-
AVX-+
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
DualGraphics+-
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
SIPP-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Deep Learning Boost-+
Supported AI Software Frameworks-OpenVINO™, WindowsML, DirectML, ONNX RT, WebNN

Security technologies

A10-9600P and Core Ultra 7 265F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-9600P and Core Ultra 7 265F are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-9600P and Core Ultra 7 265F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4DDR5-6400
Maximum memory sizeno data192 GB
Max memory channels22

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R5 GraphicsN/A
iGPU core count6no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A10-9600P and Core Ultra 7 265F integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A10-9600P and Core Ultra 7 265F integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10-9600P and Core Ultra 7 265F.

PCIe version3.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes820

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 June 2016 7 January 2025
Physical cores 4 20
Threads 4 20
Chip lithography 28 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 65 Watt

A10-9600P has 333.3% lower power consumption.

Ultra 7 265F, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, 400% more physical cores and 400% more threads, and a 833.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between A10-9600P and Core Ultra 7 265F. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that A10-9600P is a notebook processor while Core Ultra 7 265F is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A10-9600P
A10-9600P
Intel Core Ultra 7 265F
Core Ultra 7 265F

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 327 votes

Rate A10-9600P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 11 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 265F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors A10-9600P and Core Ultra 7 265F, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.