VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 vs A10-8700P

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Aggregate performance score

A10-8700P
2015
4 cores / 4 threads, 12 Watt
1.29
+200%
VIA Nano QuadCore L4700
2011
4 cores / 4 threads, 28 Watt
0.43

A10-8700P outperforms Nano QuadCore L4700 by a whopping 200% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking24253156
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD CarrizoVIA
Power efficiency1.560.65
DesignerAMDVIA
Manufacturerno dataTSMC
Architecture codenameCarrizo (2015−2018)CNQ (2011)
Release date3 June 2015 (10 years ago)12 May 2011 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A10-8700P and VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed1.8 GHz1.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz1.47 GHz
Bus rateno data1333 MHz
L1 cacheno data128 KB (per core)
L2 cache2048 KB1 MB (per core)
Chip lithography28 nm40 nm
Die sizeno data2x 66 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistors3100 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A10-8700P and VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFP4VIA nanoBGA2
Power consumption (TDP)12 - 35 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-8700P and VIA Nano QuadCore L4700. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsHSA 1.0no data
AES-NI++
FMAFMA4-
AVXAVX+
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
DualGraphics+-
TrueAudio+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
Out-of-band client management+-
VirusProtect+-
HSA+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-8700P and VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-xno data+
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-8700P and VIA Nano QuadCore L4700. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-2133DDR3
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R6 GraphicsOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)
iGPU core count6no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A10-8700P and VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A10-8700P and VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10-8700P and VIA Nano QuadCore L4700.

PCIe version3.0no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

A10-8700P 1.29
+200%
VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 0.43

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

A10-8700P 2978
+84.4%
VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 1615

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.29 0.43
Recency 3 June 2015 12 May 2011
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 28 Watt

A10-8700P has a 200% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 42.9% more advanced lithography process, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

The AMD A10-8700P is our recommended choice as it beats the VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A10-8700P
A10-8700P
VIA Nano QuadCore L4700
Nano QuadCore L4700

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 136 votes

Rate A10-8700P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 5 votes

Rate VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors A10-8700P and VIA Nano QuadCore L4700, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.