Ryzen 3 3200U vs A10-8700P

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

A10-8700P
2015
4 cores / 4 threads
1.44

Ryzen 3 3200U outperforms A10-8700P by 72% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A10-8700P and Ryzen 3 3200U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking20751649
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD CarrizoAMD Ryzen 3
Architecture codenameCarrizo (2015−2018)Picasso-U (Zen)
Release date3 June 2015 (8 years ago)6 January 2019 (5 years ago)
Current price$466 $488

Detailed specifications

A10-8700P and Ryzen 3 3200U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads44
Base clock speed1.8 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz3.5 GHz
L1 cacheno data128K (per core)
L2 cache2048 KB512K (per core)
L3 cacheno data4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm12 nm
Die sizeno data246 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C105 °C
Number of transistors3100 Million4500 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on A10-8700P and Ryzen 3 3200U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFP4FP5
Power consumption (TDP)12 - 35 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-8700P and Ryzen 3 3200U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsHSA 1.0DDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI1+
FMAFMA4+
AVXAVX+
FRTC1no data
FreeSync1no data
PowerTune-no data
DualGraphics1no data
TrueAudio+no data
PowerNow+no data
PowerGating+no data
Out-of-band client management+no data
VirusProtect+no data
HSA+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-8700P and Ryzen 3 3200U are enumerated here.

AMD-V1+
IOMMU 2.0+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-8700P and Ryzen 3 3200U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-2133DDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidthno data38.397 GB/s
ECC memory supportno data+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R6 GraphicsAMD Radeon RX Vega 3
iGPU core count6no data
Enduro+no data
Switchable graphics1no data
UVD+no data
VCE+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A10-8700P and Ryzen 3 3200U integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A10-8700P and Ryzen 3 3200U integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan1no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10-8700P and Ryzen 3 3200U.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanesno data12

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A10-8700P 1.44
Ryzen 3 3200U 2.47
+71.5%

Ryzen 3 3200U outperforms A10-8700P by 72% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

A10-8700P 2231
Ryzen 3 3200U 3819
+71.2%

Ryzen 3 3200U outperforms A10-8700P by 71% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

A10-8700P 491
Ryzen 3 3200U 774
+57.6%

Ryzen 3 3200U outperforms A10-8700P by 58% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

A10-8700P 1086
Ryzen 3 3200U 1487
+36.9%

Ryzen 3 3200U outperforms A10-8700P by 37% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

A10-8700P 2334
Ryzen 3 3200U 4258
+82.4%

Ryzen 3 3200U outperforms A10-8700P by 82% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

A10-8700P 6394
Ryzen 3 3200U 9284
+45.2%

Ryzen 3 3200U outperforms A10-8700P by 45% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

A10-8700P 2978
Ryzen 3 3200U 3755
+26.1%

Ryzen 3 3200U outperforms A10-8700P by 26% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

A10-8700P 17.19
Ryzen 3 3200U 14.03
+22.5%

A10-8700P outperforms Ryzen 3 3200U by 23% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

A10-8700P 194
Ryzen 3 3200U 334
+72.2%

Ryzen 3 3200U outperforms A10-8700P by 72% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

A10-8700P 69
Ryzen 3 3200U 129
+87%

Ryzen 3 3200U outperforms A10-8700P by 87% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

A10-8700P 1.5
Ryzen 3 3200U 2.2
+46.7%

Ryzen 3 3200U outperforms A10-8700P by 47% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

A10-8700P 1328
Ryzen 3 3200U 1613
+21.5%

Ryzen 3 3200U outperforms A10-8700P by 21% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

A10-8700P 74
Ryzen 3 3200U 98
+32.8%

Ryzen 3 3200U outperforms A10-8700P by 33% in x264 encoding pass 1.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

A10-8700P 15
Ryzen 3 3200U 20
+28.7%

Ryzen 3 3200U outperforms A10-8700P by 29% in x264 encoding pass 2.

Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core

Benchmark coverage: 5%

A10-8700P 1975
Ryzen 3 3200U 3282
+66.2%

Ryzen 3 3200U outperforms A10-8700P by 66% in Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core.

Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core

Benchmark coverage: 5%

A10-8700P 4677
Ryzen 3 3200U 6922
+48%

Ryzen 3 3200U outperforms A10-8700P by 48% in Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.44 2.47
Integrated graphics card 2.97
Recency 3 June 2015 6 January 2019
Physical cores 4 2
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 15 Watt

The Ryzen 3 3200U is our recommended choice as it beats the A10-8700P in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A10-8700P and Ryzen 3 3200U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A10-8700P
A10-8700P
AMD Ryzen 3 3200U
Ryzen 3 3200U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 109 votes

Rate A10-8700P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 1380 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 3200U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A10-8700P or Ryzen 3 3200U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.