Pentium T2370 vs A10-8700P
Primary details
Comparing A10-8700P and Pentium T2370 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 2104 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | AMD Carrizo | no data |
| Architecture codename | Carrizo (2015−2018) | no data |
| Release date | 3 June 2015 (9 years ago) | 1 January 2008 (16 years ago) |
| Current price | $466 | $20 |
Detailed specifications
A10-8700P and Pentium T2370 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | no data |
| Threads | 4 | no data |
| Base clock speed | 1.8 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 3.2 GHz | no data |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | no data |
| Number of transistors | 3100 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on A10-8700P and Pentium T2370 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | FP4 BGA | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 12 - 35 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-8700P and Pentium T2370. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | HSA 1.0 | no data |
| HSA | + | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon R6 (Carrizo) | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
A10-8700P outperforms Pentium T2370 by 301% in Passmark.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
A10-8700P outperforms Pentium T2370 by 173% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
A10-8700P outperforms Pentium T2370 by 206% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 3 June 2015 | 1 January 2008 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 12 Watt | 35 Watt |
A10-8700P has an age advantage of 7 years, and 191.7% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between A10-8700P and Pentium T2370. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between A10-8700P and Pentium T2370, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
