i3-1125G4 vs A10-8700P

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A10-8700P
2015
4 cores / 4 threads, 12 Watt
1.41
Core i3-1125G4
2020
4 cores / 8 threads, 28 Watt
6.04
+328%

Core i3-1125G4 outperforms A10-8700P by a whopping 328% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A10-8700P and Core i3-1125G4 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking22131103
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD CarrizoIntel Tiger Lake
Power efficiency3.8120.41
Architecture codenameCarrizo (2015−2018)Tiger Lake-UP3 (2020−2021)
Release date3 June 2015 (9 years ago)2 September 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A10-8700P and Core i3-1125G4 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads48
Base clock speed1.8 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz3.7 GHz
Bus rateno data4 GT/s
L1 cacheno data96K (per core)
L2 cache2048 KB1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm10 nm SuperFin
Maximum core temperature90 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors3100 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on A10-8700P and Core i3-1125G4 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFP4FCBGA1449
Power consumption (TDP)12 - 35 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-8700P and Core i3-1125G4. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsHSA 1.0Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
FMAFMA4+
AVXAVX+
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
DualGraphics+-
TrueAudio+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
Out-of-band client management+-
VirusProtect+-
HSA+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

A10-8700P and Core i3-1125G4 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-8700P and Core i3-1125G4 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-8700P and Core i3-1125G4. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-2133DDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB
Max memory channels22

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R6 GraphicsIntel UHD Graphics for 11th Gen Intel Processors
iGPU core count6no data
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Video HDno data+
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-
Graphics max frequencyno data1.25 GHz
Execution Unitsno data48

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A10-8700P and Core i3-1125G4 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data4
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by A10-8700P and Core i3-1125G4 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data7680x4320@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A10-8700P and Core i3-1125G4 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 1212.1
OpenGLno data4.6
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10-8700P and Core i3-1125G4.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A10-8700P 1.41
i3-1125G4 6.04
+328%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A10-8700P 2245
i3-1125G4 9587
+327%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

A10-8700P 507
i3-1125G4 1433
+183%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

A10-8700P 1126
i3-1125G4 4036
+258%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.41 6.04
Recency 3 June 2015 2 September 2020
Threads 4 8
Chip lithography 28 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 28 Watt

A10-8700P has 133.3% lower power consumption.

i3-1125G4, on the other hand, has a 328.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, 100% more threads, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The Core i3-1125G4 is our recommended choice as it beats the A10-8700P in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A10-8700P and Core i3-1125G4, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A10-8700P
A10-8700P
Intel Core i3-1125G4
Core i3-1125G4

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 119 votes

Rate A10-8700P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 389 votes

Rate Core i3-1125G4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A10-8700P or Core i3-1125G4, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.