Core 2 Quad Q9450 vs A10-8700P

VS

Aggregate performance score

A10-8700P
2015
4 cores / 4 threads, 12 Watt
1.41
+2.2%
Core 2 Quad Q9450
2008
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
1.38

A10-8700P outperforms Core 2 Quad Q9450 by a minimal 2% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A10-8700P and Core 2 Quad Q9450 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking21982224
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Carrizono data
Power efficiency3.811.37
Architecture codenameCarrizo (2015−2018)Yorkfield (2007−2009)
Release date3 June 2015 (9 years ago)March 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A10-8700P and Core 2 Quad Q9450 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed1.8 GHz2.66 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz2.67 GHz
Bus rateno data1333 MHz
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cache2048 KB12 MB (shared)
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography28 nm45 nm
Die sizeno data2x 107 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data71 °C
Number of transistors3100 Million820 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data0.85V-1.3625V

Compatibility

Information on A10-8700P and Core 2 Quad Q9450 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFP4LGA775
Power consumption (TDP)12 - 35 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-8700P and Core 2 Quad Q9450. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsHSA 1.0no data
AES-NI+-
FMAFMA4-
AVXAVX-
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
DualGraphics+-
TrueAudio+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
Out-of-band client management+-
VirusProtect+-
HSA+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FSB parityno data+

Security technologies

A10-8700P and Core 2 Quad Q9450 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-8700P and Core 2 Quad Q9450 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-8700P and Core 2 Quad Q9450. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-2133DDR1, DDR2, DDR3
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R6 Graphicsno data
iGPU core count6no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A10-8700P and Core 2 Quad Q9450 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A10-8700P and Core 2 Quad Q9450 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10-8700P and Core 2 Quad Q9450.

PCIe version3.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A10-8700P 1.41
+2.2%
Core 2 Quad Q9450 1.38

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A10-8700P 2245
+2.7%
Core 2 Quad Q9450 2186

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

A10-8700P 506
+47.1%
Core 2 Quad Q9450 344

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

A10-8700P 1129
+18.6%
Core 2 Quad Q9450 952

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.41 1.38
Chip lithography 28 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 95 Watt

A10-8700P has a 2.2% higher aggregate performance score, a 60.7% more advanced lithography process, and 691.7% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between A10-8700P and Core 2 Quad Q9450.

Be aware that A10-8700P is a notebook processor while Core 2 Quad Q9450 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A10-8700P and Core 2 Quad Q9450, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A10-8700P
A10-8700P
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9450
Core 2 Quad Q9450

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 119 votes

Rate A10-8700P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 170 votes

Rate Core 2 Quad Q9450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A10-8700P or Core 2 Quad Q9450, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.