Athlon II X4 640 vs A10-7890K

Aggregate performance score

A10-7890K
2016
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
2.28
+57.2%

A10-7890K outperforms Athlon II X4 640 by an impressive 57% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A10-7890K and Athlon II X4 640 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking17342098
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.172.92
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Architecture codenameGodaveri (2014−2018)Propus (2009−2011)
Release date11 January 2016 (8 years ago)11 May 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$150$80
Current price$342 (2.3x MSRP)$42 (0.5x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Athlon II X4 640 has 1618% better value for money than A10-7890K.

Detailed specifications

A10-7890K and Athlon II X4 640 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed4 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed4.3 GHz3 GHz
L1 cache256 KB128 KB (per core)
L2 cache4096 KB512 KB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography28 nm45 nm
Die size246 mm2169 mm2
Maximum core temperature72 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,178 million300 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on A10-7890K and Athlon II X4 640 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM2+AM3
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-7890K and Athlon II X4 640. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI1no data
FMAFMA4no data
AVXAVXno data
FRTC1no data
FreeSync1no data
PowerTune+no data
DualGraphics1no data
TrueAudio+no data
PowerNow+no data
PowerGating+no data
Out-of-band client management+no data
VirusProtect+no data
RAID-no data
HSA1no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-7890K and Athlon II X4 640 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
IOMMU 2.0+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-7890K and Athlon II X4 640. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-2133DDR3
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R7 Graphicsno data
iGPU core count8no data
Number of pipelines512no data
Enduro+no data
Switchable graphics1no data
UVD+no data
VCE+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A10-7890K and Athlon II X4 640 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A10-7890K and Athlon II X4 640 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan1no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10-7890K and Athlon II X4 640.

PCIe version3.02.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A10-7890K 2.28
+57.2%
Athlon II X4 640 1.45

A10-7890K outperforms Athlon II X4 640 by 57% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

A10-7890K 3524
+57.5%
Athlon II X4 640 2238

A10-7890K outperforms Athlon II X4 640 by 57% in Passmark.

3DMark Fire Strike Physics

Benchmark coverage: 4%

A10-7890K 4450
+7.2%
Athlon II X4 640 4150

A10-7890K outperforms Athlon II X4 640 by 7% in 3DMark Fire Strike Physics.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.28 1.45
Recency 11 January 2016 11 May 2010
Cost $150 $80
Chip lithography 28 nm 45 nm

The A10-7890K is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon II X4 640 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A10-7890K and Athlon II X4 640, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A10-7890K
A10-7890K
AMD Athlon II X4 640
Athlon II X4 640

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 117 votes

Rate A10-7890K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 1283 votes

Rate Athlon II X4 640 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A10-7890K or Athlon II X4 640, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.