FX-4130 vs A10-7870K

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A10-7870K
2015
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
2.22
+27.6%

A10-7870K outperforms FX-4130 by a significant 28% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A10-7870K and FX-4130 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking17501948
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.740.26
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Architecture codenameGodaveri (2014−2018)Zambezi (2011−2012)
Release date28 May 2015 (9 years ago)27 August 2012 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$120no data
Current price$85 (0.7x MSRP)$39

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

A10-7870K has 954% better value for money than FX-4130.

Detailed specifications

A10-7870K and FX-4130 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed3.9 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed4.1 GHz3.9 GHz
L1 cache256 KBno data
L2 cache4096 KB4096 KB
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography28 nm32 nm
Die size246 mm2315 mm2
Maximum core temperature72 °C70 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,178 million1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierYesYes
P0 Vcore voltageno dataMin: 1.2875 V - Max: 1.4125 V

Compatibility

Information on A10-7870K and FX-4130 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM2+AM3+
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-7870K and FX-4130. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI1+
FMAFMA4+
AVXAVX+
FRTC1no data
FreeSync1no data
PowerTune+no data
DualGraphics1no data
TrueAudio+no data
PowerNow+no data
PowerGating+no data
Out-of-band client management+no data
VirusProtect+no data
RAID-no data
HSA1no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-7870K and FX-4130 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-7870K and FX-4130. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-2133DDR3
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R7 GraphicsOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)
iGPU core count8no data
Number of pipelines512no data
Enduro+no data
Switchable graphics1no data
UVD+no data
VCE+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A10-7870K and FX-4130 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A10-7870K and FX-4130 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan1no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10-7870K and FX-4130.

PCIe version3.0n/a

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A10-7870K 2.22
+27.6%
FX-4130 1.74

A10-7870K outperforms FX-4130 by 28% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

A10-7870K 3436
+27.9%
FX-4130 2686

A10-7870K outperforms FX-4130 by 28% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

A10-7870K 487
+16.8%
FX-4130 417

A10-7870K outperforms FX-4130 by 17% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

A10-7870K 1238
+15.5%
FX-4130 1072

A10-7870K outperforms FX-4130 by 15% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

3DMark Fire Strike Physics

Benchmark coverage: 4%

A10-7870K 4180
+16.4%
FX-4130 3590

A10-7870K outperforms FX-4130 by 16% in 3DMark Fire Strike Physics.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.22 1.74
Recency 28 May 2015 27 August 2012
Chip lithography 28 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 125 Watt

The A10-7870K is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-4130 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A10-7870K and FX-4130, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A10-7870K
A10-7870K
AMD FX-4130
FX-4130

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 55 votes

Rate A10-7870K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 169 votes

Rate FX-4130 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A10-7870K or FX-4130, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.