Core 2 Quad Q9400s vs A10-7870K

VS

Primary details

Comparing A10-7870K and Core 2 Quad Q9400s processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1833not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.39no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency2.17no data
Architecture codenameGodaveri (2014−2016)Yorkfield (2007−2009)
Release date28 May 2015 (9 years ago)18 January 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$120no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

A10-7870K and Core 2 Quad Q9400s basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed3.9 GHz2.66 GHz
Boost clock speed4.1 GHz0.67 GHz
Bus rateno data1333 MHz
L1 cache256 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache4096 KB6 MB (shared)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography28 nm45 nm
Die size246 mm22x 82 mm2
Maximum core temperature72 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °C76 °C
Number of transistors1,178 million456 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-
VID voltage rangeno data0.85V-1.3625V

Compatibility

Information on A10-7870K and Core 2 Quad Q9400s compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM2+LGA775
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-7870K and Core 2 Quad Q9400s. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
FMAFMA4-
AVXAVX-
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics+-
TrueAudio+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
Out-of-band client management+-
VirusProtect+-
HSA+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

A10-7870K and Core 2 Quad Q9400s technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-7870K and Core 2 Quad Q9400s are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-7870K and Core 2 Quad Q9400s. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-2133DDR1, DDR2, DDR3
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R7 GraphicsOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)
iGPU core count8no data
Number of pipelines512no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A10-7870K and Core 2 Quad Q9400s integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A10-7870K and Core 2 Quad Q9400s integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10-7870K and Core 2 Quad Q9400s.

PCIe version3.02.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 May 2015 18 January 2009
Chip lithography 28 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 65 Watt

A10-7870K has an age advantage of 6 years, and a 60.7% more advanced lithography process.

Core 2 Quad Q9400s, on the other hand, has 46.2% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between A10-7870K and Core 2 Quad Q9400s. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between A10-7870K and Core 2 Quad Q9400s, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A10-7870K
A10-7870K
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400s
Core 2 Quad Q9400s

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 70 votes

Rate A10-7870K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 23 votes

Rate Core 2 Quad Q9400s on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A10-7870K or Core 2 Quad Q9400s, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.