Athlon 64 FX-74 vs A10-7870K

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A10-7870K
2015, $120
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
1.99
+262%
Athlon 64 FX-74
2006, $500
2 cores / 2 threads, 125 Watt
0.55

A10-7870K outperforms Athlon 64 FX-74 by a whopping 262% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking21143082
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.490.01
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency2.250.47
DesignerAMDAMD
Architecture codenameGodaveri (2014−2016)Windsor (2006−2007)
Release date28 May 2015 (10 years ago)November 2006 (19 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$120$500

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

A10-7870K has 4800% better value for money than Athlon 64 FX-74.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

A10-7870K and Athlon 64 FX-74 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed3.9 GHzno data
Boost clock speed4.1 GHz3 GHz
L1 cache256 KB128 KB
L2 cache4096 KB1 MB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography28 nm90 nm
Die size246 mm2235 mm2
Maximum core temperature72 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,178 million227 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on A10-7870K and Athlon 64 FX-74 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM2+F
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-7870K and Athlon 64 FX-74. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
FMAFMA4-
AVXAVX-
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics+-
TrueAudio+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
Out-of-band client management+-
VirusProtect+-
HSA+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-7870K and Athlon 64 FX-74 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-7870K and Athlon 64 FX-74. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-2133DDR1
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R7 Graphicsno data
iGPU core count8no data
จำนวนพาธไลน์512no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A10-7870K and Athlon 64 FX-74 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A10-7870K and Athlon 64 FX-74 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10-7870K and Athlon 64 FX-74.

PCIe version3.0no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

A10-7870K 1.99
+262%
Athlon 64 FX-74 0.55

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

A10-7870K 3505
+261%
Samples: 720
Athlon 64 FX-74 972
Samples: 2

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.99 0.55
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 28 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 125 Watt

A10-7870K has a 261.8% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 221.4% more advanced lithography process, and 31.6% lower power consumption.

The AMD A10-7870K is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Athlon 64 FX-74 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A10-7870K
A10-7870K
AMD Athlon 64 FX-74
Athlon 64 FX-74

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 103 votes

Rate A10-7870K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 3 votes

Rate Athlon 64 FX-74 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors A10-7870K and Athlon 64 FX-74, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.