Pentium J2850 vs A10-7860K

VS

Aggregate performance score

A10-7860K
2016
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
2.07
+223%
Pentium J2850
2013
4 cores / 4 threads, 10 Watt
0.64

A10-7860K outperforms Pentium J2850 by a whopping 223% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A10-7860K and Pentium J2850 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking19012772
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Pentium
Power efficiency3.016.06
Architecture codenameGodaveri (2014−2016)Bay Trail-D (2013)
Release date2 February 2016 (8 years ago)1 September 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$94

Detailed specifications

A10-7860K and Pentium J2850 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed3.6 GHz2.41 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz2.4 GHz
L1 cache256 KB224 KB
L2 cache4096 KB2 MB
L3 cacheno data2 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography28 nm22 nm
Die size245 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature71 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistors2,411 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on A10-7860K and Pentium J2850 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM2+FCBGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-7860K and Pentium J2850. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics+-
TrueAudio+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
PAEno data36 Bit
FDIno data-
RSTno data-

Security technologies

A10-7860K and Pentium J2850 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDBno data+
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-7860K and Pentium J2850 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data-
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-7860K and Pentium J2850. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-2133DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data8 GB
Max memory channels22

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R7 GraphicsIntel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 Series
iGPU core count8no data
จำนวนพาธไลน์512no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-
Graphics max frequencyno data854 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A10-7860K and Pentium J2850 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A10-7860K and Pentium J2850 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10-7860K and Pentium J2850.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes164

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A10-7860K 2.07
+223%
Pentium J2850 0.64

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A10-7860K 3284
+223%
Pentium J2850 1016

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.07 0.64
Recency 2 February 2016 1 September 2013
Chip lithography 28 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 10 Watt

A10-7860K has a 223.4% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 2 years.

Pentium J2850, on the other hand, has a 27.3% more advanced lithography process, and 550% lower power consumption.

The A10-7860K is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium J2850 in performance tests.

Note that A10-7860K is a desktop processor while Pentium J2850 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A10-7860K and Pentium J2850, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A10-7860K
A10-7860K
Intel Pentium J2850
Pentium J2850

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 62 votes

Rate A10-7860K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 3 votes

Rate Pentium J2850 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A10-7860K or Pentium J2850, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.