A8-7670K vs A10-7860K

VS

Aggregate performance score

A10-7860K
2016
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
2.07
+3%
A8-7670K
2015
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
2.01

A10-7860K outperforms A8-7670K by a minimal 3% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A10-7860K and A8-7670K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking18891918
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency3.012.00
Architecture codenameGodaveri (2014−2016)Godaveri (2014−2016)
Release date2 February 2016 (8 years ago)20 July 2015 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A10-7860K and A8-7670K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed3.6 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz3.9 GHz
L1 cache256 KB256 KB
L2 cache4096 KB4096 KB
Chip lithography28 nm28 nm
Die size245 mm2245 mm2
Maximum core temperature71 °C72 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °C72 °C
Number of transistors2,411 million2,411 million
64 bit support++
Unlocked multiplier++

Compatibility

Information on A10-7860K and A8-7670K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM2+FM2+
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-7860K and A8-7670K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++
FRTC++
FreeSync++
PowerTune++
DualGraphics++
TrueAudio++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-7860K and A8-7670K are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-7860K and A8-7670K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-2133DDR3-2133
Max memory channels22

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R7 GraphicsAMD Radeon R7 Graphics
iGPU core count86
Number of pipelines512512
Enduro++
Switchable graphics++
UVD++
VCE++

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A10-7860K and A8-7670K integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort++
HDMI++

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A10-7860K and A8-7670K integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12DirectX® 12
Vulkan++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10-7860K and A8-7670K.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A10-7860K 2.07
+3%
A8-7670K 2.01

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A10-7860K 3282
+2.8%
A8-7670K 3192

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.07 2.01
Recency 2 February 2016 20 July 2015
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 95 Watt

A10-7860K has a 3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 months, and 46.2% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between A10-7860K and A8-7670K.


Should you still have questions on choice between A10-7860K and A8-7670K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A10-7860K
A10-7860K
AMD A8-7670K
A8-7670K

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 61 vote

Rate A10-7860K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 5 votes

Rate A8-7670K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A10-7860K or A8-7670K, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.