A10-5750M vs A10-7850K

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A10-7850K
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
2.20
+56%

A10-7850K outperforms A10-5750M by an impressive 56% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A10-7850K and A10-5750M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking17572123
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.55no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD A-Series (Desktop)AMD A-Series
Architecture codenameGodaveri (2014−2018)Richland (2013−2014)
Release date14 January 2014 (10 years ago)1 June 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$173no data
Current price$92 (0.5x MSRP)$198

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

A10-7850K and A10-5750M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed3.7 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz3.5 GHz
L1 cache256 KB128 KB (per core)
L2 cache4096 KB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography28 nm32 nm
Die size246 mm2246 mm2
Maximum core temperature72 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °C71 °C
Number of transistors1,178 million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on A10-7850K and A10-5750M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM2+FS1r2
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-7850K and A10-5750M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsSSE1-4A, AVX, FM4A, VT86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA, DDR3-1866 Controller
AES-NI1+
FMAFMA4+
AVX++
FRTC1no data
FreeSync1no data
PowerTune-no data
DualGraphics1no data
TrueAudio+no data
PowerNow+no data
PowerGating+no data
Out-of-band client management+no data
VirusProtect+no data
HSA1no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-7850K and A10-5750M are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-7850K and A10-5750M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-2133DDR3
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R7 GraphicsAMD Radeon HD 8650G
iGPU core count8no data
Number of pipelines512no data
Enduro+no data
Switchable graphics1no data
UVD+no data
VCE+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A10-7850K and A10-5750M integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A10-7850K and A10-5750M integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan1no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10-7850K and A10-5750M.

PCIe version3.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A10-7850K 2.20
+56%
A10-5750M 1.41

A10-7850K outperforms A10-5750M by 56% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

A10-7850K 3408
+56.8%
A10-5750M 2174

A10-7850K outperforms A10-5750M by 57% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

A10-7850K 451
+46%
A10-5750M 309

A10-7850K outperforms A10-5750M by 46% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

A10-7850K 1129
+66.8%
A10-5750M 677

A10-7850K outperforms A10-5750M by 67% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

A10-7850K 3216
+24.7%
A10-5750M 2579

A10-7850K outperforms A10-5750M by 25% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

A10-7850K 10278
+59.3%
A10-5750M 6451

A10-7850K outperforms A10-5750M by 59% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

A10-7850K 4748
+46.6%
A10-5750M 3238

A10-7850K outperforms A10-5750M by 47% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

A10-7850K 13.1
+71.8%
A10-5750M 22.5

A10-5750M outperforms A10-7850K by 72% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

A10-7850K 4
+55.4%
A10-5750M 2

A10-7850K outperforms A10-5750M by 55% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

A10-7850K 318
+52.2%
A10-5750M 209

A10-7850K outperforms A10-5750M by 52% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

A10-7850K 86
+13.2%
A10-5750M 76

A10-7850K outperforms A10-5750M by 13% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

A10-7850K 1.01
+18.8%
A10-5750M 0.85

A10-7850K outperforms A10-5750M by 19% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

A10-7850K 2.2
+46.7%
A10-5750M 1.5

A10-7850K outperforms A10-5750M by 47% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

A10-7850K 2140
+5.2%
A10-5750M 2035

A10-7850K outperforms A10-5750M by 5% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

A10-7850K 24
+60.7%
A10-5750M 15

A10-7850K outperforms A10-5750M by 61% in x264 encoding pass 2.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

A10-7850K 114
+50%
A10-5750M 76

A10-7850K outperforms A10-5750M by 50% in x264 encoding pass 1.

Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core

Benchmark coverage: 5%

A10-7850K 7094
+48.2%
A10-5750M 4787

A10-7850K outperforms A10-5750M by 48% in Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core.

Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core

Benchmark coverage: 5%

A10-7850K 2333
+28.5%
A10-5750M 1816

A10-7850K outperforms A10-5750M by 28% in Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core.

Geekbench 2

Benchmark coverage: 5%

A10-7850K 6502
+37.1%
A10-5750M 4742

A10-7850K outperforms A10-5750M by 37% in Geekbench 2.

Geekbench 4.0 64-bit multi-core

Benchmark coverage: 2%

A10-7850K 6267
+26.3%
A10-5750M 4963

A10-7850K outperforms A10-5750M by 26% in Geekbench 4.0 64-bit multi-core.

Geekbench 4.0 64-bit single-core

Benchmark coverage: 2%

A10-7850K 2621
+20.5%
A10-5750M 2175

A10-7850K outperforms A10-5750M by 21% in Geekbench 4.0 64-bit single-core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.20 1.41
Recency 14 January 2014 1 June 2013
Chip lithography 28 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 35 Watt

The A10-7850K is our recommended choice as it beats the A10-5750M in performance tests.

Note that A10-7850K is a desktop processor while A10-5750M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A10-7850K and A10-5750M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A10-7850K
A10-7850K
AMD A10-5750M
A10-5750M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 280 votes

Rate A10-7850K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 248 votes

Rate A10-5750M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A10-7850K or A10-5750M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.