Xeon L5430 vs A10-7800

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A10-7800
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
2.07
+41.8%

A10-7800 outperforms Xeon L5430 by a considerable 42% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A10-7800 and Xeon L5430 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking18492123
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.260.13
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Architecture codenameKaveri (2014−2015)no data
Release date31 July 2014 (10 years ago)1 July 2008 (16 years ago)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

A10-7800 has 100% better value for money than Xeon L5430.

Detailed specifications

A10-7800 and Xeon L5430 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)no data
Threads4no data
Base clock speed3.5 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.9 GHzno data
L1 cache256Kno data
L2 cache4 MBno data
Chip lithography28 nmno data
Die size245 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data57 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °Cno data
Number of transistors2,411 millionno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on A10-7800 and Xeon L5430 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFM2+no data
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt50 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-7800 and Xeon L5430. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+no data
FMA+no data
AVX+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-7800 and Xeon L5430 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-7800 and Xeon L5430. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-2133no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardRadeon R7no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10-7800 and Xeon L5430.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A10-7800 2.07
+41.8%
Xeon L5430 1.46

A10-7800 outperforms Xeon L5430 by 42% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 65%

A10-7800 3208
+41.9%
Xeon L5430 2260

A10-7800 outperforms Xeon L5430 by 42% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.07 1.46
Recency 31 July 2014 1 July 2008
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 50 Watt

A10-7800 has a 41.8% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 6 years.

Xeon L5430, on the other hand, has 30% lower power consumption.

The A10-7800 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon L5430 in performance tests.

Note that A10-7800 is a desktop processor while Xeon L5430 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A10-7800 and Xeon L5430, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A10-7800
A10-7800
Intel Xeon L5430
Xeon L5430

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 255 votes

Rate A10-7800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.8 29 votes

Rate Xeon L5430 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A10-7800 or Xeon L5430, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.