Xeon Gold 5318Y vs A10-7800

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A10-7800
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
1.82
Xeon Gold 5318Y
2021
24 cores / 48 threads, 165 Watt
18.79
+932%

Xeon Gold 5318Y outperforms A10-7800 by a whopping 932% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2176366
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency1.194.84
DesignerAMDIntel
ManufacturerGlobalFoundriesIntel
Architecture codenameKaveri (2014−2015)Ice Lake-SP (2021)
Release date31 July 2014 (11 years ago)6 April 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A10-7800 and Xeon Gold 5318Y basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads448
Base clock speed3.5 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz3.4 GHz
L1 cache256 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache4096 KB1 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data36 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm10 nm
Die size245 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature71 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °C87 °C
Number of transistors2,411 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data+

Compatibility

Information on A10-7800 and Xeon Gold 5318Y compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFM2+FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt165 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-7800 and Xeon Gold 5318Y. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
DualGraphics+-
TrueAudio+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
Out-of-band client management+-
VirusProtect+-
HSA+-
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

A10-7800 and Xeon Gold 5318Y technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-7800 and Xeon Gold 5318Y are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-7800 and Xeon Gold 5318Y. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-2133DDR4-2933
Maximum memory sizeno data6 TB
Max memory channels28
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R7 Graphicsno data
iGPU core count8no data
จำนวนพาธไลน์512no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A10-7800 and Xeon Gold 5318Y integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A10-7800 and Xeon Gold 5318Y integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10-7800 and Xeon Gold 5318Y.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes1664

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

A10-7800 1.82
Xeon Gold 5318Y 18.79
+932%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

A10-7800 3211
Samples: 876
Xeon Gold 5318Y 33139
+932%
Samples: 5

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.82 18.79
Recency 31 July 2014 6 April 2021
Physical cores 4 24
Threads 4 48
Chip lithography 28 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 165 Watt

A10-7800 has 153.8% lower power consumption.

Xeon Gold 5318Y, on the other hand, has a 932.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The Intel Xeon Gold 5318Y is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD A10-7800 in performance tests.

Note that A10-7800 is a desktop processor while Xeon Gold 5318Y is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A10-7800
A10-7800
Intel Xeon Gold 5318Y
Xeon Gold 5318Y

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 371 votes

Rate A10-7800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 15 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 5318Y on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors A10-7800 and Xeon Gold 5318Y, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.