Processor N200 vs A10-7800

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A10-7800
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
2.02
+29.5%
Processor N200
2023
4 cores / 4 threads, 6 Watt
1.56

A10-7800 outperforms Processor N200 by a significant 29% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A10-7800 and Processor N200 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking19112107
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Alder Lake-N
Power efficiency2.9424.61
Architecture codenameKaveri (2014−2015)Alder Lake-N (2023)
Release date31 July 2014 (10 years ago)3 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$193

Detailed specifications

A10-7800 and Processor N200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed3.5 GHz0.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz3.7 GHz
L1 cache256 KB96 KB (per core)
L2 cache4096 KB2 MB (shared)
L3 cacheno data6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm10 nm
Die size245 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature71 °C105 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °Cno data
Number of transistors2,411 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data+

Compatibility

Information on A10-7800 and Processor N200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM2+Intel BGA 1264
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-7800 and Processor N200. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
DualGraphics+-
TrueAudio+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
Out-of-band client management+-
VirusProtect+-
HSA+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Security technologies

A10-7800 and Processor N200 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-7800 and Processor N200 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-7800 and Processor N200. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-2133DDR4, DDR5 4800 MHz Single-channel
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R7 GraphicsIntel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)
iGPU core count8no data
Number of pipelines512no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A10-7800 and Processor N200 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A10-7800 and Processor N200 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10-7800 and Processor N200.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes169

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.02 1.56
Recency 31 July 2014 3 January 2023
Chip lithography 28 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 6 Watt

A10-7800 has a 29.5% higher aggregate performance score.

Processor N200, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 983.3% lower power consumption.

The A10-7800 is our recommended choice as it beats the Processor N200 in performance tests.

Note that A10-7800 is a desktop processor while Processor N200 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A10-7800 and Processor N200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A10-7800
A10-7800
Intel Processor N200
Processor N200

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 299 votes

Rate A10-7800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 145 votes

Rate Processor N200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A10-7800 or Processor N200, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.