EPYC 9575F vs A10-7800

VS

Primary details

Comparing A10-7800 and EPYC 9575F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1927not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency2.94no data
Architecture codenameKaveri (2014−2015)Turin (2024)
Release date31 July 2014 (10 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$11,791

Detailed specifications

A10-7800 and EPYC 9575F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads4128
Base clock speed3.5 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz5 GHz
L1 cache256 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache4096 KB1 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm4 nm
Die size245 mm28x 70.6 mm2
Maximum core temperature71 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °Cno data
Number of transistors2,411 million66,520 million
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on A10-7800 and EPYC 9575F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFM2+SP5
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt400 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-7800 and EPYC 9575F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
DualGraphics+-
TrueAudio+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
Out-of-band client management+-
VirusProtect+-
HSA+-
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-7800 and EPYC 9575F are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-7800 and EPYC 9575F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-2133DDR5
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R7 GraphicsN/A
iGPU core count8no data
จำนวนพาธไลน์512no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A10-7800 and EPYC 9575F integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A10-7800 and EPYC 9575F integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10-7800 and EPYC 9575F.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes16128

Pros & cons summary


Recency 31 July 2014 10 October 2024
Physical cores 4 64
Threads 4 128
Chip lithography 28 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 400 Watt

A10-7800 has 515.4% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9575F, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, 1500% more physical cores and 3100% more threads, and a 600% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between A10-7800 and EPYC 9575F. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that A10-7800 is a desktop processor while EPYC 9575F is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A10-7800 and EPYC 9575F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A10-7800
A10-7800
AMD EPYC 9575F
EPYC 9575F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 305 votes

Rate A10-7800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9575F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A10-7800 or EPYC 9575F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.