Core 2 Quad Q9505 vs A10-7800

Primary details

Comparing A10-7800 and Core 2 Quad Q9505 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking	1816	2138
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.26	2.69
Market segment	Desktop processor	Desktop processor
Architecture codename	Kaveri (2014−2015)	no data
Release date	31 July 2014 (9 years ago)	1 July 2009 (14 years ago)
Current price	$185	$42

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Core 2 Quad Q9505 has 935% better value for money than A10-7800.

Detailed specifications

A10-7800 and Core 2 Quad Q9505 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	4 (Quad-Core)	no data
Threads	4	no data
Base clock speed	3.5 GHz	2.83 GHz
Boost clock speed	3.9 GHz	no data
L1 cache	256 KB	no data
L2 cache	4096 KB	no data
L3 cache	no data	6 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography	28 nm	45 nm
Die size	245 mm2	no data
Maximum core temperature	71 °C	71 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)	74 °C	no data
Number of transistors	2,411 million	no data
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	no data	-
Unlocked multiplier	No	No
VID voltage range	no data	0.85V-1.3625V

Compatibility

Information on A10-7800 and Core 2 Quad Q9505 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	no data
Socket	FM2+	FCLGA775,LGA775
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-7800 and Core 2 Quad Q9505. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI	+	-
FMA	+	no data
AVX	+	no data
FRTC	1	no data
FreeSync	1	no data
PowerTune	-	no data
DualGraphics	1	no data
TrueAudio	+	no data
PowerNow	+	no data
PowerGating	+	no data
Out-of-band client management	+	no data
VirusProtect	+	no data
HSA	1	no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	no data	+
Turbo Boost Technology	no data	-
Hyper-Threading Technology	no data	-
Idle States	no data	+
Thermal Monitoring	no data	+
Demand Based Switching	no data	-
Status	no data	Discontinued

Security technologies

A10-7800 and Core 2 Quad Q9505 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	no data	+
EDB	no data	+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-7800 and Core 2 Quad Q9505 are enumerated here.

AMD-V	+	no data
VT-d	no data	+
VT-x	no data	+
IOMMU 2.0	+	no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-7800 and Core 2 Quad Q9505. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR3-2133	no data
Max memory channels	2	no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card	AMD Radeon R7 Graphics	no data
iGPU core count	8	no data
Number of pipelines	512	no data
Enduro	+	no data
Switchable graphics	1	no data
UVD	+	no data
VCE	+	no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A10-7800 and Core 2 Quad Q9505 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort	+	no data
HDMI	+	no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A10-7800 and Core 2 Quad Q9505 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX	DirectX® 12	no data
Vulkan	1	no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10-7800 and Core 2 Quad Q9505.

PCIe version	3.0	no data
PCI Express lanes	16	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A10-7800 outperforms Core 2 Quad Q9505 by 49% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Performance score	2.07	1.39
Recency	31 July 2014	1 July 2009
Chip lithography	28 nm	45 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	95 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between A10-7800 and Core 2 Quad Q9505, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---