Atom Z3735G vs A10-7800

VS

Aggregate performance score

A10-7800
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
2.02
+312%
Atom Z3735G
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 2 Watt
0.49

A10-7800 outperforms Atom Z3735G by a whopping 312% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A10-7800 and Atom Z3735G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking19222903
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Power efficiency2.9323.06
Architecture codenameKaveri (2014−2015)Bay Trail-T (2013−2014)
Release date31 July 2014 (10 years ago)9 April 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$17

Detailed specifications

A10-7800 and Atom Z3735G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed3.5 GHz1.33 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz1.83 GHz
L1 cache256 KB56K (per core)
L2 cache4096 KB2 MB
L3 cacheno data2 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography28 nm22 nm
Die size245 mm2112 mm2
Maximum core temperature71 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °Cno data
Number of transistors2,411 millionno data
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on A10-7800 and Atom Z3735G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM2+UTFCBGA592
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt2 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-7800 and Atom Z3735G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX+-
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
DualGraphics+-
TrueAudio+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
Out-of-band client management+-
VirusProtect+-
HSA+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Security technologies

A10-7800 and Atom Z3735G technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

Anti-Theftno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-7800 and Atom Z3735G are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-xno data+
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-7800 and Atom Z3735G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-2133DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data1 GB
Max memory channels21
Maximum memory bandwidthno data5.3 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R7 GraphicsIntel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 Series
iGPU core count8no data
จำนวนพาธไลน์512no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-
Graphics max frequencyno data646 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A10-7800 and Atom Z3735G integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A10-7800 and Atom Z3735G integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10-7800 and Atom Z3735G.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A10-7800 2.02
+312%
Atom Z3735G 0.49

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A10-7800 3212
+316%
Atom Z3735G 772

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.02 0.49
Recency 31 July 2014 9 April 2014
Chip lithography 28 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 2 Watt

A10-7800 has a 312.2% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 3 months.

Atom Z3735G, on the other hand, has a 27.3% more advanced lithography process, and 3150% lower power consumption.

The A10-7800 is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom Z3735G in performance tests.

Note that A10-7800 is a desktop processor while Atom Z3735G is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A10-7800 and Atom Z3735G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A10-7800
A10-7800
Intel Atom Z3735G
Atom Z3735G

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 302 votes

Rate A10-7800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 67 votes

Rate Atom Z3735G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A10-7800 or Atom Z3735G, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.