EPYC 7543P vs A10-7700K

VS

Aggregate performance score

A10-7700K
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
2.06
EPYC 7543P
2021
32 cores / 64 threads, 225 Watt
42.78
+1977%

EPYC 7543P outperforms A10-7700K by a whopping 1977% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A10-7700K and EPYC 7543P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking191356
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.2512.50
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD A-Series (Desktop)AMD EPYC
Power efficiency2.0117.66
Architecture codenameGodaveri (2014−2016)Milan (2021−2023)
Release date14 January 2014 (10 years ago)12 January 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$152$2,730

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 7543P has 4900% better value for money than A10-7700K.

Detailed specifications

A10-7700K and EPYC 7543P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads464
Base clock speed3.5 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz3.7 GHz
Multiplierno data28
L1 cache256 KB2 MB
L2 cache4096 KB16 MB
L3 cache0 KB256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm7 nm+
Die size246 mm28x 81 mm2
Maximum core temperature72 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,178 million33,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on A10-7700K and EPYC 7543P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM2+SP3
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt225 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-7700K and EPYC 7543P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsSSE1-4a, AVX, AES, FMA4, VTno data
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
DualGraphics+-
TrueAudio+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
Out-of-band client management+-
VirusProtect+-
HSA+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-7700K and EPYC 7543P are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-7700K and EPYC 7543P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-2133DDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TiB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidthno data204.795 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R7 GraphicsN/A
iGPU core count6no data
Number of pipelines384no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A10-7700K and EPYC 7543P integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A10-7700K and EPYC 7543P integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10-7700K and EPYC 7543P.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A10-7700K 2.06
EPYC 7543P 42.78
+1977%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A10-7700K 3205
EPYC 7543P 66687
+1981%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.06 42.78
Recency 14 January 2014 12 January 2021
Physical cores 4 32
Threads 4 64
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 225 Watt

A10-7700K has 136.8% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7543P, on the other hand, has a 1976.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 7543P is our recommended choice as it beats the A10-7700K in performance tests.

Note that A10-7700K is a desktop processor while EPYC 7543P is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A10-7700K and EPYC 7543P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A10-7700K
A10-7700K
AMD EPYC 7543P
EPYC 7543P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 158 votes

Rate A10-7700K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 17 votes

Rate EPYC 7543P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A10-7700K or EPYC 7543P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.