EPYC 7543 vs A10-7400P

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A10-7400P
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
1.34
EPYC 7543
2021
32 cores / 64 threads, 225 Watt
40.45
+2919%

EPYC 7543 outperforms A10-7400P by a whopping 2919% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A10-7400P and EPYC 7543 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking215759
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data25.63
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD KaveriAMD EPYC
Architecture codenameKaveri (2014−2015)Milan (2021)
Release date4 June 2014 (10 years ago)15 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$3,761
Current price$45 $1629 (0.4x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

A10-7400P and EPYC 7543 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads464
Base clock speed2.5 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz3.7 GHz
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cache4096 KB512 KB (per core)
L3 cacheno data256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm7 nm+
Die size245 mm28x 81 mm2
Maximum core temperature102 °Cno data
Number of transistors2410 Million33,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on A10-7400P and EPYC 7543 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2
SocketFP3SP3
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt225 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-7400P and EPYC 7543. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA, DDR3-1866 Controllerno data
AES-NI++
FMA+no data
AVX++
FRTC1no data
PowerTune-no data
TrueAudio+no data
PowerNow+no data
PowerGating+no data
Out-of-band client management+no data
VirusProtect+no data
RAID-no data
HSA1no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-7400P and EPYC 7543 are enumerated here.

AMD-V1+
IOMMU 2.0+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-7400P and EPYC 7543. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1866DDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TiB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidthno data204.795 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R6 GraphicsN/A
iGPU core count6no data
Number of pipelines384no data
Enduro+no data
Switchable graphics1no data
UVD+no data
VCE+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A10-7400P and EPYC 7543 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A10-7400P and EPYC 7543 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan1no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10-7400P and EPYC 7543.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A10-7400P 1.34
EPYC 7543 40.45
+2919%

EPYC 7543 outperforms A10-7400P by 2919% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

A10-7400P 2078
EPYC 7543 62569
+2911%

EPYC 7543 outperforms A10-7400P by 2911% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.34 40.45
Recency 4 June 2014 15 March 2021
Physical cores 4 32
Threads 4 64
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 225 Watt

The EPYC 7543 is our recommended choice as it beats the A10-7400P in performance tests.

Be aware that A10-7400P is a notebook processor while EPYC 7543 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A10-7400P and EPYC 7543, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A10-7400P
A10-7400P
AMD EPYC 7543
EPYC 7543

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 11 votes

Rate A10-7400P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 5 votes

Rate EPYC 7543 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A10-7400P or EPYC 7543, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.